Yes, that's right but does it actually matter? If you still have total control over everything and it can pay you a salary for looking after it etc, why do you actually need to own it? Is it actually a real issue or is it just a mindset thing?
I know people with company cars. They do not fret over not owning the vehicle and they get to do pretty much whatever they want with it. How would ownership make things better for them?
You won't be able to pass anything down
I am not entirely sure about that. I know it looks that way but I believe that the most wealthy put everything into trust. "Trust" is a UK term, I am not sure how it translates. It is a kind of non-profit organisation. There are trustees who run and control the trust and they can award themselves any benefits.
One of the advantages, in the UK at least, is that you do not get hit by inheritance taxes because you do not own anything. You just need to ensure that you pass control on to the next generation before you die.
My guess is that the super-rich will try to get us to let go of everything and then they will use trusts to keep it in their families for posterity. Maybe we should preempt them and make our own arrangements first?
Caveat: I am not a lawyer or financial advisor.
As a Brit myself, I totally agree! I used to think the Second Amendment was a bad idea but as I have been following things in the US more closely since 2015 I have changed my mind.
A surprising number of Brits think Morgan is an a*hole so we agree on that as well!
Literally: FASCISM
You beat me to it. I came here to say the exact same thing.
The metropolitan area of Moscow is bigger than Israel. Just a thought ...
This is not a Biden issue. It is worldwide, well, western-worldwide. It is being done on purpose to rein in The West and reduce its power. That way we can be more easily subdued and incorporated into the new Globalist world order.
A lot of quite easy sums are not being done about "renewables". People are getting away with electric vehicles at the moment because there are not many of them. If we go entirely electric then we will need about twice the amount of electricity we are using now.
One interesting sum you can do is to pick a form of "renewable" energy, find a site where it is being generated and find out the total energy they produced in a year. Then see how much land that facility used. Now divide the energy produced into the total energy for your country to calculate how many of those facilities you would need. You can then work out the area required.
I completely covered about six counties in England with solar panels for the UK. Where the people, farms, industry and wildlife were moved to would be an interesting question.
I also looked at wind farms in the USA. An area equal to eight times that of Texas should do it.
No need to believe me, do your own sums.
"Almost" powerful word that.
I don't know if the moon landings were faked or not but I would like to know what happened to the technology that allowed astronauts to pass through the Van Allen Belts unscathed. it seems remarkable that NASA could "lose" such information.
Is that Detroit, Michigan? They covered the windows.
There are over 150 studies about masks in this link from Brownstone.org
We always follow the science except when it harms our narrative.
Where do you think the chans got their information from?
One idea was that flu completely died out for the first year of the pandemic. It was almost as if they were counting flu cases as COVID-19 cases.
See this article from Scientific American'
The split up election cheating for similar reasons. It means that there is more than one person to catch and, even if you do and you prove something bad happened, you can fall back on the "this would not be a big enough cheat to affect the outcome" ploy.
I am not an expert so this could well be complete rubbish but I have a model in my mind which seems to fit the facts:
- mRNA jabs inject toxin-making instructions into your body.
- Body produces toxins without any apparent off-switch.
- Body reacts to toxins by concentrating its immune system on them.
- Body's defences are reduced in other areas as it tries ever harder to counter the toxin factories.
- Immune system no longer able to cope with any other issues.
- Basically, you now have AIDS and could fall prey to any new infection.
My take on events such as these is that several people come together to help each other because they all benefit in some way.
We saw it in 9/11 as well. The Pentagon would get its mislaid $2.3 trillion out of the news before it had hardly made an appearance. The offices auditing the books would be destroyed along with all the incriminating records. The Military Industrial Complex (MIC) would be in line to supply a new war. The Overton window would have been opened sufficiently to pass some draconian laws removing people's rights if you say the word: terrorism. Silverstein would make a killing on the insurance and not have to pay to remove the asbestos from the WTC. Those in the know could short airline stock and make a profit.
For JFK, we have the Mafia payback aspect, the MIC disliking any de-escalation in Vietnam, LBJ getting the top job and in a position to hide his many devious doings, the CIA not wanting to be shattered into a thousand pieces etc.
Same basic plan: organise the job; line up a patsy; carry out the hit; kill the patsy before he can give his account; another problem solved.
In other news:
Bank interest in turkeys increases by 5% to 40% on Thanksgiving weekend!
My advice would be: Richard Feynman.
His description of the scientific method applies. The trick is to have a model in mind then see if the new facts you discover fit with that model. Relying on certain names is not a safe method.
My guess would be, in no particular order:
- JFK wanted to scale back the Vietnam war
- He wanted to smash the CIA into a thousand pieces
- His father obtained Mob help to turn out the vote for JFK but they did not get what was promised.
This film has details. The link goes to the part where the conspirators meet the day before JFK was shot and you only need to watch a minute or so. The other three and a half hours are good if you have the time!
It is much more than carbon credits. If they control food, money and energy then they can control you completely. Carbon emissions come from energy use so restricting carbon dioxide emissions is a way to restrict energy use.
They are obviously not serious about restricting CO2 emissions because they are allowing China and India to expand as much as they like. When you can restrict energy then you are justified in increasing the cost of fuel. It will become more expensive to drive a car and heat or cool your home.
The solution they propose is for you to move into some modern, well insulated, homes that are so close to all the amenities that you do not need a car. Hence: 15 minute cities. Off-grid living will be outlawed, houses in the country will be deemed inefficient. Your taxes will be raised to price you out of your home and into their new concentration camps.
When the man who invented the process, and won the Nobel Prize for it, tells you that PCR is not a test then maybe we non-scientists should listen?
https://rumble.com/voe9fw-nobel-prize-winner-pandemic-created-by-97-false-positive-pcr-test.html
You beat me to it!
This list of 89 Members of Congress with dual Israeli citizenship is a bit old now but it explains a lot.