It wasn't the pot. Most group arrangements I remember failed because of arguments over fairness. If one person is holding down an outside job to bring in money, is he/she more valuable to the group than the one nobly volunteering to do all the cooking? What if only one has a car, and the one with a job depends on the car to get there? The more successful groups planned labor division and group reliance without outside influences.
Thanks for the link. The fact that they had a work ethic surprises me. Most hippies are pot smoking lay abouts.
It wasn't the pot. Most group arrangements I remember failed because of arguments over fairness. If one person is holding down an outside job to bring in money, is he/she more valuable to the group than the one nobly volunteering to do all the cooking? What if only one has a car, and the one with a job depends on the car to get there? The more successful groups planned labor division and group reliance without outside influences.