That said, I am still reserving judgement. He seems like a smart guy, and as a defamation lawyer, he ought to damn-well know what he is doing when he makes wild accusations towards powerful public figures.
I know he loves himself, but that doesn't mean he isn't sincere in his fight against the enemies of state. Again, time will tell.
Well, I disagree with your assertion that essentially translates to the burden of proof being on the accused. If someone that most people dismissed as being credible accused me of something outlandish, I probably wouldn't pay it any mind at all.
But yes, if they are true, then they are not wild in the sense of being insane, but they are wild in that they are a broad leap from public opinion, patterns of behavior, etc. If I know my sweet old neighbor who everyone loves is secretly a KKK member, and I call them out, it's still a wild accusation -- but that doesn't mean it's true or false.
A day of research just on this board about the ones he states, will show him right on the money. As Q has stated "They won't be able to walk the streets." Lin has taken on the bigger reveals task with a zeal..
Again, I never said he was wrong, just that I, like many others, are unsure about him.
What happened to that warehouse full of counterfeit mail-in ballots he sent pictures of before the GA runoff? If legit, that seems like it would be an open and shut case.
Why has he set hard dates for things that haven't come true? We'll see about his "10-15 days" prediction from last week.
He has been correct about things, but he has also been incorrect about things, including things he stated with a knowing confidence.
I hope he is right about the things he claims, but I have no reason to trust that he is.
That said, I am still reserving judgement. He seems like a smart guy, and as a defamation lawyer, he ought to damn-well know what he is doing when he makes wild accusations towards powerful public figures.
I know he loves himself, but that doesn't mean he isn't sincere in his fight against the enemies of state. Again, time will tell.
They aren't wild if they are true and by the lack of reactions from the "defamed" rendered them true.
Well, I disagree with your assertion that essentially translates to the burden of proof being on the accused. If someone that most people dismissed as being credible accused me of something outlandish, I probably wouldn't pay it any mind at all.
But yes, if they are true, then they are not wild in the sense of being insane, but they are wild in that they are a broad leap from public opinion, patterns of behavior, etc. If I know my sweet old neighbor who everyone loves is secretly a KKK member, and I call them out, it's still a wild accusation -- but that doesn't mean it's true or false.
A day of research just on this board about the ones he states, will show him right on the money. As Q has stated "They won't be able to walk the streets." Lin has taken on the bigger reveals task with a zeal..
Again, I never said he was wrong, just that I, like many others, are unsure about him.
What happened to that warehouse full of counterfeit mail-in ballots he sent pictures of before the GA runoff? If legit, that seems like it would be an open and shut case.
Why has he set hard dates for things that haven't come true? We'll see about his "10-15 days" prediction from last week.
He has been correct about things, but he has also been incorrect about things, including things he stated with a knowing confidence.
I hope he is right about the things he claims, but I have no reason to trust that he is.