I thought the concept of "shedding" spike proteins sounded a bit far-fetched, but I do respect the opinions of Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, who I have followed for 20 years:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/l45gYscF26Qw/
I think the biggest point is that there is so much we do not know. And can't yet know.
It's just a guess because we see needle, we know (some) contents mRNA/DNA create spike and we think, well this is the novel element, and the untaxed are reporting the same a vaxxed, so it's an easy quick assumption before more applied rigorous.
As pointed out the "self spreading" vaccine angle, appeared out of the shedding Conner and for that we have been focused on something, we may have MISSED, and that is a big thing to miss, so we have it now in the sights.
To me that is the value of the "shedding" controversy.
I thought the concept of "shedding" spike proteins sounded a bit far-fetched, but I do respect the opinions of Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, who I have followed for 20 years: https://www.bitchute.com/video/l45gYscF26Qw/
I think the biggest point is that there is so much we do not know. And can't yet know.
It's just a guess because we see needle, we know (some) contents mRNA/DNA create spike and we think, well this is the novel element, and the untaxed are reporting the same a vaxxed, so it's an easy quick assumption before more applied rigorous.
As pointed out the "self spreading" vaccine angle, appeared out of the shedding Conner and for that we have been focused on something, we may have MISSED, and that is a big thing to miss, so we have it now in the sights.
To me that is the value of the "shedding" controversy.