Hope this is allowed! I've browsed on this site for a while, even had another username where I engaged in some fairly civil debates with other users before I was banned due to not being a Q follower.
Interested in having a friendly discussion with anyone who's up for it!
A bit about me:
I'm a mechanical engineer working in product marketing I live in a major city, Chicago, and have pretty much only voted democrat I am a homeowner I have followed conspiracies for a while based solely on my own curiosity, and by and large found that a lot of the major ones (pizzagate, Q) don't make a ton of sense, but I'm not here to argue that. I think we're just gonna have different opinions on it.
All said, happy to have a casual AMA! Not interested in flamebaiting or arguing
Go ahead and look up Hunter's live video interview for his book.
The problem with BlueAnons like yourself, is that you don't understand how evidence works. You are going to be waiting for the guilty party to make a live video confession that is covered by all of the mainstream media sources. Oh, but wait, Hunter actually DID "confess" during that interview for his book. Weird. It's almost like your research is really bad because you can't find anything...
I would highly recommend you take a course on Logic and Rhetoric. Maybe try some of those "logic puzzles" that are designed for gradeschoolers. Start with those ones, you know: if you have 3 apples, and Barney has 2 oranges, how many bananas does Jose have. Those kinds of things. You really need to be able to handle those kinds of things.
You clearly aren't at the level that you need to be in order to have discourse here. I really hope that you didn't pay too much for your education because it is lacking.
I find it absolutely HILARIOUS that you are attempting to question my research on timelines. I did my research. My knowledge is chronological. I am talking about when the Bidens were relevant to the discussion. You are trying to make the discussion happen BEFORE the Bidens were there. Which is completely false and a severe flaw in your logic.
I wish you luck in gaining the required intellectual abilities, but again, I highly doubt it...
And if you find yourself doubting our abilities on this forum (and 8kun, etc) look up the MIT study of when they "infiltrated a Q forum!" and found that our research and logic is unmatched. So... ya... good luck to you.
edit to add: Oh! also, read books on intrigue and military intelligence. Tom Clancy books would be a good place to start.
((commented here because the forum scolded me due to our discussion getting "too long"))
So I take it you’re not clear on the timeline? Because you seem to be avoiding the question.
When Biden said that he would withhold money to Ukraine unless the prosecutor was fired, how long until the prosecutor was fired, and how long until Ukraine got the money that was being withheld?
Let me give you a lesson on research and how sometimes, in order to prove a positive you end up proving the negative. Do you follow?? Do I need to slow that down for you??
Step 1: Biden says that he was never involved in Hunter's Business dealings. https://archive.is/Jlqft
Step 2: Hunter associate refutes Biden's statement: https://archive.is/Kzy6U
BUT! The author tries to draw conclusions that aren't related:
Analyze this sentence... Why would Joe need a role in Hunter's businesses just to meet with them?? Those sentences are inequivalent. This is how they trick you!
Step 3: Oh, wait, are you saying that Hunter and Joe DID MEET WITH Hunter's associates?? Weird... https://archive.is/nhNEd
Bonus step 4: Joe said he never met with Burisma execs... https://archive.is/3Uri1
Bonus step 5: Joe and Hunter in picture with said Burisma execs... https://archive.is/kpEwQ
This was all done with a drop that came out, what, two days ago??
You have to keep track in your mind of the things that these people are saying because the news cycle goes so fast and is so hypnotic, by design. They say something that is true but in a derisive way, they say something that is false and prey on your fears so that you believe that it is true.
I literally did this search in 5 minutes. Find Biden statement, and then prove it wrong with other Biden statement.
I don’t follow the news cycle, so you don’t need to have this concern. I operate on facts.
I literally just gave you even more facts that you are choosing to ignore. Congrats. You ARE a Biden voter.
Dude. Your comprehension is lacking.
I used his statement to start my hunt into his dirty practices. My goodness. And it's still going on right now! Look up stuff happening TODAY!
Do you not remember Burisma admitting to bribing the Bidens? My word. I'm so disappointed in your lack of ability. You seem to have hit your limit.
I would highly recommend utilizing the "search" functions in this group as well as patriots.win.
I would highly recommend watching the ENTIRE interview (regardless of what interview) instead of clever highlights that utilize clever editing.
So still no? Because again, this timeline is crucial as the foundation to what you’re saying as a whole.
LOL. You are refusing to look at ALL of the evidence I have given you and are relentlessly pursuing just one element. No wonder.
I would highly recommend you research how to research.