Hope this is allowed! I've browsed on this site for a while, even had another username where I engaged in some fairly civil debates with other users before I was banned due to not being a Q follower.
Interested in having a friendly discussion with anyone who's up for it!
A bit about me:
I'm a mechanical engineer working in product marketing I live in a major city, Chicago, and have pretty much only voted democrat I am a homeowner I have followed conspiracies for a while based solely on my own curiosity, and by and large found that a lot of the major ones (pizzagate, Q) don't make a ton of sense, but I'm not here to argue that. I think we're just gonna have different opinions on it.
All said, happy to have a casual AMA! Not interested in flamebaiting or arguing
Election tallies aren't judged by crowd size
The image isn't referencing crowd size at all. Read the numbers on each line and try again.
Well statistics are indicative of trend, but not fact. If it's unusual that something happened despite X, Y, and Z, that doesn't make it impossible.
Just because Biden lost certain states doesn't mean he can't possibly win. There are 47 other states that a candidate can win.
You're cherry-picking and deflecting. Those three states were just one data point. What about the fact that Trump won 5 times as many counties as Biden and 3 times as many as Obama? Sure, one data point being irregular can be excused, but ALL of those? And does it not matter when each of those data points is off by THAT much? Surely you can be reasonable and admit that this doesn't add up to a Biden win.
Votes are not determined by counties, they're determined by the number of votes a person gets. Liberal cities have a much larger population than conservative counties, so it's expected that trump would win more counties.
Statistically, it's still possible for a candidate to win despite all of these facts.