Hope this is allowed! I've browsed on this site for a while, even had another username where I engaged in some fairly civil debates with other users before I was banned due to not being a Q follower.
Interested in having a friendly discussion with anyone who's up for it!
A bit about me:
I'm a mechanical engineer working in product marketing I live in a major city, Chicago, and have pretty much only voted democrat I am a homeowner I have followed conspiracies for a while based solely on my own curiosity, and by and large found that a lot of the major ones (pizzagate, Q) don't make a ton of sense, but I'm not here to argue that. I think we're just gonna have different opinions on it.
All said, happy to have a casual AMA! Not interested in flamebaiting or arguing
Do it then. I'd love for you to show you are smarter than a world renowned physicist. Video and all. Explain where he is wrong.
http://www.toolsforanalysis.com/douglas.html
So, essentially the big part of his point is his graphs that show weird curves, but the X and Y axis data points are measured as age of population (X axis) and number of people who voted (Y axis).
Take a given age, say 30, and you have a datapoint of how many people voted who were of that age, say a thousand. Well, logistically that should be represented as a single point, or a bar on a bar graph. As you get different ages, you have single, fixed points.
Now, this guy seems to have not only connected them with the line, but also appears to have normalized the trend a bit so the curve is smooth. This isn't his representation of the 6th order polynomial curve (which is, again, just gibberish. The words he said don't mean anything) but this is supposedly the hard data from the voting results.
Representing that with a curve and then utilizing this to compare to another curve of ages and voter turnout makes no sense, because by connecting the points and normalizing the trendline the data becomes skewed.
I hope this makes sense, I didn't make a video because I was out with pals last night, but I still wanted to get this description in.
Does he have the raw data that he used? Because if I could see that and make my own graph it'd be INCREDIBLY useful
Ask him. He's exceptionally transparent and will provide with where to get that data. He responds to his Facebook messenger often. Tell him your sceptical of the data and he will set you straight.
Oh I'm not on facebook anymore. Got tired of the bullshit long ago. I thought people on this site were too?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nj4MuFp4hYE
He's more info for you to digest. You don't know the numbers or the method he used, but you say it's false..https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC57eE4MaR0oIwTinM__WQSg
Nope, I keep mine to open peoples eyes with things like these two gems. I'll bet you are all vaxxed up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?fbclid=IwAR1hv-MkdijS4YxJxDDAfja8fsTfD-iKIv0LwwrcZpAJuzeL1Qg1biJDnlY&v=2wcpy6iLfLE&feature=youtu.be
https://files.catbox.moe/atdj83.MP4?fbclid=IwAR0cBKZ5i2mX0rn7AOfmd1_ix4fRu1kVw3END6ArlOcLB2AIPwwJg9ObIWk