"Ditto. Except I'm not sorry. You sound like a passive-aggressive, low-test faggot."
Oh I'm not passive aggressive, do not mistake my sarcasm for passive aggression, I did say you're retarded, and I don't retract that statement.
"Hitler did indeed take money from the (((banks))), but he used it against them. That's why leftist Jews here in the States like to call Trump Hitler; they think he's only backing Israel as part of 4D chess. Q did say that Israel would be saved for last, but whatever happens, I doubt Trump is gonna be coming out against Judaism anytime soon."
Oh come on bro, that's such a stretch that it invalidates any arguments against Trump being owned by Israel. So you believe the bankers didn't expect this to happen? Yeah he used it against them, and in return they destroyed his country and forever pacified the most war-like people on the planet. Whatever plan he thought he had, failed, and no matter what he did, it was inevitable. The west siding with the Communists, who then became the new enemy, should tell you all you need to know about the pieces on the board and who was moving them. Not all Jews come out against Trump, most of the elitist ones do, but race is hardly a defining factor as that characteristic is concerned. There are plenty of white people who have sold us out. Ok Q saying Israel is saved for last is not saying Hitler was a black hat, can you not provide sauce on this, or a post number? Judaism is not the problem. Most Jews you meet are not the diabolical schemers that lurk in the shadows you seem to believe are everywhere. I have met and spoken with many IDF soldiers, and we have more in common than you think. But your blind, generalized fear will keep you from seeing that.
"Did you not just say in your last comment that you consider yourself far-right? I agree with you that there's a lot of nasty infighting in far/alt-right circles (not that I'd even consider myself that), but there's not much mental gymnastics going on. If someone promotes good, they're good. If someone promotes evil, they're evil. Even despite his close ties to Jews, Trump is promoting more good than evil -- therefore, I'll support him... at least for the time being. Hitler, however, was definitely very, very good."
I should have elaborated. My fundamental principles still have an alt-right flavor, and anything that isn't contradictory to new-found information is still very much there, but it's important not get wrapped up in the idolization of the fallen. I mentioned I was far right because I figured it would help paint the picture that out of many here, I'm not as blindly anti-hitler, to prevent a strawman that was almost certain to follow. There are all kinds of mental gymnastics going on in that realm, the one you're not a part of but know all about. To pretend that Hitler took money and then used it against them, is to not understand why he got it in the first place. To disregard so much of recorded history in holocaust apologetics is even more ridiculous. I should mention that the Holocaust didn't end a quarter of the lives that Communism world-wide did, Communism we allied with against Germany. Or this idea of Jewish people controlling the world, Whilst there are several very powerful people with no affiliation. Jews score higher in IQ, thus I believe this is the reason behind their disproportionate advantage in high profile positions. But again we are supposed to ignore that and believe it's because we are goyim.
"If someone promotes evil, they're evil. Even despite his close ties to Jews, Trump is promoting more good than evil -- therefore, I'll support him... at least for the time being. Hitler, however, was definitely very, very good.""
"close ties to Jews" that's literally as deep as you've dug, his son in law is Jewish, and that is sufficient for you... Lmao. Please spare me your "low test" insults. You'll support whoever is the most edgy to maintain your false sense of intellectually superiority. It's common among people with this train of thought. Define "Very Good". I would absolutely agree if he had stopped before invading Poland. Fuck yes. But he was arrogant and did not take his generals advice, and in the end, whatever good he did was destroyed, and the German people paid a price for it ten-fold, still are. To say this is Very, very good, is beyond me. Again he is not the anti-christ, but he lost. He failed. And Communism outlasted him. We idolize the man who defeated himself (one can argue not invading Russia and instead invading England would've won him the war. But muh living room.)
Let the past be in the past. The future holds much brighter things from humanity, if we learn from our mistakes.
"Ditto. Except I'm not sorry. You sound like a passive-aggressive, low-test faggot."
Oh I'm not passive aggressive, do not mistake my sarcasm for passive aggression, I did say you're retarded, and I don't retract that statement.
"Hitler did indeed take money from the (((banks))), but he used it against them. That's why leftist Jews here in the States like to call Trump Hitler; they think he's only backing Israel as part of 4D chess. Q did say that Israel would be saved for last, but whatever happens, I doubt Trump is gonna be coming out against Judaism anytime soon."
Oh come on bro, that's such a stretch that it invalidates any arguments against Trump being owned by Israel. So you believe the bankers didn't expect this to happen? Yeah he used it against them, and in return they destroyed his country and forever pacified the most war-like people on the planet. Whatever plan he thought he had, failed, and no matter what he did, it was inevitable. The west siding with the Communists, who then became the new enemy, should tell you all you need to know about the pieces on the board and who was moving them. Not all Jews come out against Trump, most of the elitist ones do, but race is hardly a defining factor as that characteristic is concerned. There are plenty of white people who have sold us out. Ok Q saying Israel is saved for last is not saying Hitler was a black hat, can you not provide sauce on this, or a post number? Judaism is not the problem. Most Jews you meet are not the diabolical schemers that lurk in the shadows you seem to believe are everywhere. I have met and spoken with many IDF soldiers, and we have more in common than you think. But your blind, generalized fear will keep you from seeing that.
"Did you not just say in your last comment that you consider yourself far-right? I agree with you that there's a lot of nasty infighting in far/alt-right circles (not that I'd even consider myself that), but there's not much mental gymnastics going on. If someone promotes good, they're good. If someone promotes evil, they're evil. Even despite his close ties to Jews, Trump is promoting more good than evil -- therefore, I'll support him... at least for the time being. Hitler, however, was definitely very, very good."
I should have elaborated. My fundamental principles still have an alt-right flavor, and anything that isn't contradictory to new-found information is still very much there, but it's important not get wrapped up in the idolization of the fallen. I mentioned I was far right because I figured it would help paint the picture that out of many here, I'm not as blindly anti-hitler, to prevent a strawman that was almost certain to follow. There are all kinds of mental gymnastics going on in that realm, the one you're not a part of but know all about. To pretend that Hitler took money and then used it against them, is to not understand why he got it in the first place. To disregard so much of recorded history in holocaust apologetics is even more ridiculous. I should mention that the Holocaust didn't end a quarter of the lives that Communism world-wide did, Communism we allied with against Germany. Or this idea of Jewish people controlling the world, Whilst there are several very powerful people with no affiliation. Jews score higher in IQ, thus I believe this is the reason behind their disproportionate advantage in high profile positions. But again we are supposed to ignore that and believe it's because we are goyim.
"If someone promotes evil, they're evil. Even despite his close ties to Jews, Trump is promoting more good than evil -- therefore, I'll support him... at least for the time being. Hitler, however, was definitely very, very good.""
"close ties to Jews" that's literally as deep as you've dug, his son in law is Jewish, and that is sufficient for you... Lmao. Please spare me your "low test" insults. You'll support whoever is the most edgy to maintain your false sense of intellectually superiority. It's common among people with this train of thought. Define "Very Good". I would absolutely agree if he had stopped before invading Poland. Fuck yes. But he was arrogant and did not take his generals advice, and in the end, whatever good he did was destroyed, and the German people paid a price for it ten-fold, still are. To say this is Very, very good, is beyond me. Again he is not the anti-christ, but he lost. He failed. And Communism outlasted him. We idolize the man who defeated himself (one can argue not invading Russia and instead invading England would've won him the war. But muh living room.)
Let the past be in the past. The future holds much brighter things from humanity, if we learn from our mistakes.