I just found this new website and it’s absolutely amazing, maybe a little too much to be honest... do you guys know if this Michael Baxter is legit ?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (9)
sorted by:
Michael Baxter, along with his mate Dimitry something or other, have been doing fake and clickbait news for a few years at least.
NewsPunch, etc. Ran into them in 2018, when the Great Awakening was getting started, and they had very clearly fake and bogus news stories, like stories about Brad Pit doing something or other, saying stuff, etc, no references, no clear sourcing, bad journalism, even tacky discourse that no trained writer would use, etc.
They may have tried to refine themselves since then, to latch onto and exploit the patriot movement (back then they were clearly targeting the more 'conspiracy' minded - by which I mean, those undiscerning people who latch onto theories without evidence, or sauce, or logical due diligence, etc - so I say:
#Grifter
I give Baxter and Dimitry (who may even be Baxter) no credence whatsoever, based on what I saw of them in 2018 (back then anons would occasionally link them, and when I followed up to validate, check and research, would come up with bunkus).
Cheers.
*PS. Bards FM Scott K referenced a Baxter site, Real Raw News, in one of his podcasts. Scott K is VERY legit, but I don't listen to him enough to know if he ever followed up or had his team research enough into RRN and what they concluded. Myself, however, - ZERO credence to RRN.
Thanks a lot for the answer fren, as much as I liked their stuff it felt way too good to be true
Welcome, Based.
I'd say keep on it, but research and discern.
Since Q stopped posting i9n December, we have had SOOOOOO many fakers come out with special, inside info, that no one can confirm anyway, so you have to either believe it or just use only logical inference to support it.
Q never used that method. It was all about investigate for yourself, dig, find answers, apply critical thinking and due diligence.
How many with secret inside info were posting in December, January etc? All of it bogus, of course, or at a minimum, unverifiable.
Q established their credentials impeccably. These dudes, not so much.