We demand that you immediately rescind your false and malicious tweet
asserting that Maricopa County “spoiled evidence” in the days before we
provided the server to the Senate. Your tweet, which relies on the “modified
date” shown in the screenshot as evidence of wrongdoing, is demonstrably
false; the only thing it does demonstrate is your auditors’ incompetence.
Name calling. Demands. Lol, this means nothing.
On April 12, 2021, the Elections Department shut down the server to be
packed up and made ready for delivery to the Senate. At no point was any
data deleted when shutting down the server and packing up the equipment.
Windows Servers will often change the “metadata” (additional data on files
such as creation date, access date, modified date, owner, etc.) on Microsoft
SQL database files based on actions performed on the Microsoft SQL
(MSQL) Services that are needed to run the databases.
I can't verify that info on SQL dbs on shutdown or stop. What I can verify is when a file is deleted the modified date is updated. I know that from every day pc use, and for normies/non-techies a simple google search will tell you that.
Maricopa County provided you the actual Dominion server as commanded by
your subpoena and we did not transfer or delete from that server any data
from the 2020 General Election that was subject to your subpoena. You have
now returned that server to us. Evidently your “auditors” made a copy of that
server and are conducting their analysis on the copy.
No shit. They had to do a copy. They cannot alter any files on the original machine. That is called evidence contamination. This is PC investigative work 101.
The screenshot reveals that your “auditors” were using R-Studio Network
Technician to conduct their analysis. That software is used to identify files
that are missing at the spot the software is told to search. Yet you provided
the screenshot falsely asserting that these identified “missing files” were
deleted and evidence was “spoiled”. Nothing in this screenshot indicates that
any file was deleted or spoiled. At most what can be discerned from this
screenshot is that R-Studio, as used by your “auditors,” did not locate within
the copy your vendor created the particular files listed in the column on the
right.
Jeebus. This is the equivalent of saying you don't know what this program does and you explaining it is lying. So you can't prove it. Wow. Just... wow.
Still, these files, and the Database, have the ominous red X-mark. We cannot
say for certain what that mark indicates—other than that it likely indicates that
R-Studio was unable to locate the files. The screenshot does not identify
what type of search your “auditors” ran, and you conveniently failed to provide
the full report the search generated.
O_O
Gaslighting. Clear glass lighting. This can be easily dispelled by a google search but whatevs.
So for claim 1, this is a Gaslighting. They are trying to implant the idea that Cyber Ninjas do not know what they are doing via legal speak. This is psyop act, design to discredit their work as nonsense.
Hey look, a brand new account. Jeebus, you are glowing so much we can see you from orbit.
Seriously google search it. The red x's for the program represent a deleted file. Its not hard. I've used the damn program previously.
The screenshot is perfectly indicative of what happened, especially considering the fact the files were recovered from a deleted state. This is fact. Go try your shill stuff elsewhere.
Scenario1: how the hell does one delete files during imaging? How does one delete files during an imaging process? I've done literally hundreds of these images and that explanation makes zero sense. You don't touch the file structure, you are imaging a volume.
More importantly: have you even worked with SQL? I have. Extensively. Databases do not get deleted during normal operation. To delete databases the way they were deleted involves several deliberate steps that would need to occur including the stopping of services and disabling of auto-start of services on restart. And if security is as tight as it is supposed to be, normal users would not be able to touch those dbs at the file level without specific administrative access.
Its clear you aren't a developer, or engineer. You need to stop talking about what you don't know about.
Scenario 2: They already said during the Maricopa Audit hearing this week that the files were 100% recovered. In fact they stated this weeks ago, we just got the confirmation at that hearing
If the next thing you say is that the auditors deleted the files on purpose to bring heat the election board you need to go sit down and stop hitting whatever narcotic you are on.
Last, this really has nothing to do with these facts, but just an overall level of panic my the Democrats: Senate President Karen Fann just received a package of white powder. While powder came back negative, its a clear message that audit is making people sweat, and you are trying to demoralize folks and throw shade on the audit.
Gonna break this down:
Part 1 of TLDR)
We demand that you immediately rescind your false and malicious tweet asserting that Maricopa County “spoiled evidence” in the days before we provided the server to the Senate. Your tweet, which relies on the “modified date” shown in the screenshot as evidence of wrongdoing, is demonstrably false; the only thing it does demonstrate is your auditors’ incompetence.
Name calling. Demands. Lol, this means nothing.
On April 12, 2021, the Elections Department shut down the server to be packed up and made ready for delivery to the Senate. At no point was any data deleted when shutting down the server and packing up the equipment. Windows Servers will often change the “metadata” (additional data on files such as creation date, access date, modified date, owner, etc.) on Microsoft SQL database files based on actions performed on the Microsoft SQL (MSQL) Services that are needed to run the databases.
I can't verify that info on SQL dbs on shutdown or stop. What I can verify is when a file is deleted the modified date is updated. I know that from every day pc use, and for normies/non-techies a simple google search will tell you that.
Maricopa County provided you the actual Dominion server as commanded by your subpoena and we did not transfer or delete from that server any data from the 2020 General Election that was subject to your subpoena. You have now returned that server to us. Evidently your “auditors” made a copy of that server and are conducting their analysis on the copy.
No shit. They had to do a copy. They cannot alter any files on the original machine. That is called evidence contamination. This is PC investigative work 101.
The screenshot reveals that your “auditors” were using R-Studio Network Technician to conduct their analysis. That software is used to identify files that are missing at the spot the software is told to search. Yet you provided the screenshot falsely asserting that these identified “missing files” were deleted and evidence was “spoiled”. Nothing in this screenshot indicates that any file was deleted or spoiled. At most what can be discerned from this screenshot is that R-Studio, as used by your “auditors,” did not locate within the copy your vendor created the particular files listed in the column on the right.
Jeebus. This is the equivalent of saying you don't know what this program does and you explaining it is lying. So you can't prove it. Wow. Just... wow.
Still, these files, and the Database, have the ominous red X-mark. We cannot say for certain what that mark indicates—other than that it likely indicates that R-Studio was unable to locate the files. The screenshot does not identify what type of search your “auditors” ran, and you conveniently failed to provide the full report the search generated.
O_O
Gaslighting. Clear glass lighting. This can be easily dispelled by a google search but whatevs.
So for claim 1, this is a Gaslighting. They are trying to implant the idea that Cyber Ninjas do not know what they are doing via legal speak. This is psyop act, design to discredit their work as nonsense.
No, it's a screenshot and a narrative that the screenshot does not support. Simple as.
[USER WAS BANNED FOR HAVING AN EDUCATED OPINION BACKED BY EXPERTISE, WHILST DISSENTING FROM MSM NARRATIVE. THINK ABOUT THAT]
Hey look, a brand new account. Jeebus, you are glowing so much we can see you from orbit.
Seriously google search it. The red x's for the program represent a deleted file. Its not hard. I've used the damn program previously.
The screenshot is perfectly indicative of what happened, especially considering the fact the files were recovered from a deleted state. This is fact. Go try your shill stuff elsewhere.
No, you didn't and no it doesn't
Scenario 1, files were deleted as part of normal operations and person imaginging drive screwed up
Scenario 2, files were secure wiped on 4/12 in which case they were not recovered
[USER WAS BANNED FOR HAVING AN EDUCATED OPINION BACKED BY EXPERTISE, WHILST DISSENTING FROM MSM NARRATIVE. THINK ABOUT THAT]
Your explanation is just silly.
Scenario1: how the hell does one delete files during imaging? How does one delete files during an imaging process? I've done literally hundreds of these images and that explanation makes zero sense. You don't touch the file structure, you are imaging a volume.
More importantly: have you even worked with SQL? I have. Extensively. Databases do not get deleted during normal operation. To delete databases the way they were deleted involves several deliberate steps that would need to occur including the stopping of services and disabling of auto-start of services on restart. And if security is as tight as it is supposed to be, normal users would not be able to touch those dbs at the file level without specific administrative access.
Its clear you aren't a developer, or engineer. You need to stop talking about what you don't know about.
Scenario 2: They already said during the Maricopa Audit hearing this week that the files were 100% recovered. In fact they stated this weeks ago, we just got the confirmation at that hearing
If the next thing you say is that the auditors deleted the files on purpose to bring heat the election board you need to go sit down and stop hitting whatever narcotic you are on.
Last, this really has nothing to do with these facts, but just an overall level of panic my the Democrats: Senate President Karen Fann just received a package of white powder. While powder came back negative, its a clear message that audit is making people sweat, and you are trying to demoralize folks and throw shade on the audit.
Its time for you to go.