I was going over the drops again and I don't think I've ever seen this question asked here: Is there any part of the Q universe that you disagree with?
For me, its this:
No coincidences
I personally believe in coincidences: I think they happen every day and we all experience them, and I think it's wise to recognize coincidence as a possibility. Like Ian Fleming wrote: *If it is once, it's happenstance, it can happen. If it is twice, it is a coincidence. And if it is thrice, it's a conspiracy." I think coincidences CAN be exposed as intentional, but arent automatically a sign of a greater scheme.
Hope I dont get banned for this, just interested in where everybody's head is at. Does anyone have that one Q bit they disagree with?
I get what you mean about coincidences, although that’s (more) a result of fellow overenthusiastic Anons making some dumb ‘proofs’—not to take away from the occasional fantastic proof/DD on here, just feels like there’s been fewer and fewer of them as time goes on. For me, the hardest angle to grasp is the whole Snowden bad / NSA good thing. Not that I actively disbelieve it, it’s just such an inversion of everything I thought I knew going into this. I also have a difficult time thinking Tulsi Gabbard is actually DS—and yes, I’ve seen that weird group she was a part of. She just strikes me as a genuine patriot, makes me wonder/hope she’s a white hat double agent or some shit ?♂️