I was going over the drops again and I don't think I've ever seen this question asked here: Is there any part of the Q universe that you disagree with?
For me, its this:
No coincidences
I personally believe in coincidences: I think they happen every day and we all experience them, and I think it's wise to recognize coincidence as a possibility. Like Ian Fleming wrote: *If it is once, it's happenstance, it can happen. If it is twice, it is a coincidence. And if it is thrice, it's a conspiracy." I think coincidences CAN be exposed as intentional, but arent automatically a sign of a greater scheme.
Hope I dont get banned for this, just interested in where everybody's head is at. Does anyone have that one Q bit they disagree with?
I trust Sessions, Wray I honestly do too, main reason is because he said that there wasn't any antifa at the capitol riots when we know damn sure that there was. It's just blatantly false, and also when he was questioned about qanon he was subtle and necessarily didn't say anything bad.. Huber idk
Barr is the one that scares me.. His dad hired epstein to be a professor, yeah doesn't really mean anything but I read testimony of Barr running drugs in South America with the 5 star trust I believe it was, and he got a book deal... Barr also was in charge of John Durham Jrs, ms-13 investigation, which Wray was also at..
Barr is the biggest catalyst in my mind because he could've fucked everything up/delayed, but for sure Barr isn't 100% clean..
Yeah forgot to put that, also something that should have flagged trump and he could've just been testing him too.. But idk, the only other explanation for me is trump has blackmail on barr/certain people and uses that power to enforce the Q plan playing out