It depends on who you ask. The medical community from what I understand seems to think that the MRNA more or less teach the body how to produce a spike protein that helps in future immune responses. The more....controversial opinions range from it being a crock to it being some sort of serum designed to cut the population in half.
The problem is that at this moment, you cannot be sure of that being the purpose of it(in all likelihood that's not it.) Personally speaking, I believe that a lot of what you are seeing for arguments coming from the anti vaccine front relies too much on misunderstandings about what vaccines actually are/recycled fears instead of looking at the actual data/experimental nature of it. At any rate, I think once this is all over you will see that the vaccine is likely overhyped/it's main purpose was more or less to make Pfizer and their ilk a shit ton of money instead of relying on more natural means to treat the virus(or alternatively a means for good pr.)
It depends on who you ask. The medical community from what I understand seems to think that the MRNA more or less teach the body how to produce a spike protein that helps in future immune responses. The more....controversial opinions range from it being a crock to it being some sort of serum designed to cut the population in half.
The problem is that at this moment, you cannot be sure of that being the purpose of it(in all likelihood that's not it.) Personally speaking, I believe that a lot of what you are seeing for arguments coming from the anti vaccine front relies too much on misunderstandings about what vaccines actually are/recycled fears instead of looking at the actual data/experimental nature of it. At any rate, I think once this is all over you will see that the vaccine is likely overhyped/it's main purpose was more or less to make Pfizer and their ilk a shit ton of money instead of relying on more natural means to treat the virus(or alternatively a means for good pr.)