First, I will never get the vax, dangerous or not, it is experimental and the 99.8% survival rate of covid does not require a vax.
My point is, how can it be dangerous and allowef to roll out by the Q team?
And if it is not dangerous does it hurt our cause for us to try and convince others that it is dangerous? Should we simply quietly not get it and if asked explain low mortality rate of covid and experimental status of vax, but avoid alarmist comments about the vax being a depopulation tool.
Lastly, if the vax is indeed dangerous, did Q lose? And if that is the case what is plan B.
https://qposts.online/post/3724
Q post 3724
It must be done right.
It must be done according to the rule of law.
It must carry weight.
It must be proven in the court of law.
There can be no mistakes
In order to try someone for murder,you need dead bodies. Allowing the vax kinda makes sense,sadly people have to die.
The only silver lining is that this time around the people most responsible seem to be those taking the most hits (or the number of actively responsible people decreased with some of us learning from mistakes past).
All of us failed for folding too early in arguments and not being able to open the eyes of our obnoxious libtard brothers and sisters through any means necessary.
But they actively pushed humanity into its potential demise.