First, I will never get the vax, dangerous or not, it is experimental and the 99.8% survival rate of covid does not require a vax.
My point is, how can it be dangerous and allowef to roll out by the Q team?
And if it is not dangerous does it hurt our cause for us to try and convince others that it is dangerous? Should we simply quietly not get it and if asked explain low mortality rate of covid and experimental status of vax, but avoid alarmist comments about the vax being a depopulation tool.
Lastly, if the vax is indeed dangerous, did Q lose? And if that is the case what is plan B.
Did you read this paragraph too? Keep cursing, you’re losing credibility tough guy. How about you talk to me like a grown man/woman.
“The strengths of VAERS are that it is national in scope and can quickly provide an early warning of a safety problem with a vaccine. As part of CDC and FDA's multi-system approach to post-licensure vaccine safety monitoring, VAERS is designed to rapidly detect unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events, also known as "safety signals." If a safety signal is found in VAERS, further studies can be done in safety systems such as the CDC's Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) or the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) project. These systems do not have the same limitations as VAERS, and can better assess health risks and possible connections between adverse events and a vaccine.”