I personally think the “vaccines” are bullshit! Why would you take a “vaccine” of an illness that you have a 99.X% chance of recovering from? It’s like taking a “vaccine” for the cold! Yet, they’re pushing the “vaccine” like there’s no tomorrow! Ask yourself, “why”?
Military people are getting sick from the "vaccine" the same as everyone else. They just don't disclose that to the public, but it's happening to them too.
It's not that the military is distributing a "safe" vaccine or a placebo. They provide the real mRNA "vaccine" to the soldiers, just like what is given to the public. Unfortunately, the military leaders are just as blind to the depopulation vax scam as our political leaders seem to be.
There is no approved "vaccines". Only authorized "vaccines" under EUA. I am only willing to participate in this experiment as part of the control group.
Were you discussing the Polio vaccine? if so, I stand corrected. I hate to be pedantic, but there is a huge difference between approved for use and authorized for use.
This is from the FDA: "Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives."
Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment.
Principle II
The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under international law.
Principle III
The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law, acted as Head of State or responsible government official, does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.
Principle IV
The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.
This principle could be paraphrased as follows: "It is not an acceptable excuse to say 'I was just following my superior's orders'".
Previous to the time of the Nuremberg Trials, this excuse was known in common parlance as "superior orders".[citation needed] After the prominent, high-profile event of the Nuremberg Trials, that excuse is now referred to by many as the "Nuremberg Defense". In recent times, a third term, "lawful orders" has become common parlance for some people.[citation needed] All three terms are in use today, and they all have slightly different nuances of meaning, depending on the context in which they are used.
Nuremberg Principle IV is legally supported by the jurisprudence found in certain articles in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which deal indirectly with conscientious objection.[citation needed] It is also supported by the principles found in paragraph 171 of the Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status which was issued by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Those principles deal with the conditions under which conscientious objectors can apply for refugee status in another country if they face persecution in their own country for refusing to participate in an illegal war.
Principle V
Any person charged with a crime under international law has the right to a fair trial on the facts and law.
Principle VI
The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:
(a) Crimes against peace:
(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
(b) War crimes:
Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory; murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the Seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.
(c) Crimes against humanity:
Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.
Leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any persons in execution of such plan.
Principle VII Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle VI is a crime under international law.
Remember, this isn't just about saving the United States. It's about saving the world. In order for a global-scale war crime to be prosecuted, a global-scale war crime has to be caught dead to rights - along with everyone involved in committing it (see Principle IV).
For governments to hold corporations - themselves as powerful as governments - accountable, "you gotta catch them all!"
I personally think the “vaccines” are bullshit! Why would you take a “vaccine” of an illness that you have a 99.X% chance of recovering from? It’s like taking a “vaccine” for the cold! Yet, they’re pushing the “vaccine” like there’s no tomorrow! Ask yourself, “why”?
That’s exactly what I meant! I wasn’t addressing the OP personally.
Agreed.
Military people are getting sick from the "vaccine" the same as everyone else. They just don't disclose that to the public, but it's happening to them too.
It's not that the military is distributing a "safe" vaccine or a placebo. They provide the real mRNA "vaccine" to the soldiers, just like what is given to the public. Unfortunately, the military leaders are just as blind to the depopulation vax scam as our political leaders seem to be.
There is no approved "vaccines". Only authorized "vaccines" under EUA. I am only willing to participate in this experiment as part of the control group.
Were you discussing the Polio vaccine? if so, I stand corrected. I hate to be pedantic, but there is a huge difference between approved for use and authorized for use.
This is from the FDA: "Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives."
Full page here: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_principles
Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment.
The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under international law.
The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law, acted as Head of State or responsible government official, does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.
The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.
This principle could be paraphrased as follows: "It is not an acceptable excuse to say 'I was just following my superior's orders'".
Previous to the time of the Nuremberg Trials, this excuse was known in common parlance as "superior orders".[citation needed] After the prominent, high-profile event of the Nuremberg Trials, that excuse is now referred to by many as the "Nuremberg Defense". In recent times, a third term, "lawful orders" has become common parlance for some people.[citation needed] All three terms are in use today, and they all have slightly different nuances of meaning, depending on the context in which they are used.
Nuremberg Principle IV is legally supported by the jurisprudence found in certain articles in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which deal indirectly with conscientious objection.[citation needed] It is also supported by the principles found in paragraph 171 of the Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status which was issued by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Those principles deal with the conditions under which conscientious objectors can apply for refugee status in another country if they face persecution in their own country for refusing to participate in an illegal war.
Any person charged with a crime under international law has the right to a fair trial on the facts and law.
The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:
(a) Crimes against peace:
(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
(b) War crimes: Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave labor or for any other purpose of civilian population of or in occupied territory; murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the Seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.
(c) Crimes against humanity: Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime. Leaders, organizers, instigators and accomplices participating in the formulation or execution of a common plan or conspiracy to commit any of the foregoing crimes are responsible for all acts performed by any persons in execution of such plan.
Remember, this isn't just about saving the United States. It's about saving the world. In order for a global-scale war crime to be prosecuted, a global-scale war crime has to be caught dead to rights - along with everyone involved in committing it (see Principle IV).
For governments to hold corporations - themselves as powerful as governments - accountable, "you gotta catch them all!"
Well, the world is free - the bad people just have to be removed from it for it to remain that way.