"“I do research about anything where the truth and the facts aren't readily known or have been distorted," Weisman told City Pages of Minneapolis in a May 2015 interview. "My beliefs are grounded in the truths I've found out in my study, my research. Most people don't think for themselves. They listen to the government. They listen to some media."
Was he a "Christian conspiracy theorist"...or a little too close to the truth???
He was a publisher of anything anti-jew. Cross reference any of his "citations" on your own if you wish to know who was distorting what. CW was likely (though he denied it) the author of the "Elders of Zion" fraud. He was certainly the publisher and wrote the intro. CW wasn't a "researcher" other than efforts to find anything in old text that could be distorted to support his belief that the lily white Brits were actually "Gods chosen people" and the chosen people of the old testament were actually Satanists. What he got right was "Most people don't think for themselves. They listen to the government. They listen to some media."...and that was his con. He was the media. He knew that just because it was published in a book folks would read it and most would never check sources on their own....that's a little close to the truth of it.
There is some subtilty to the layers of deception. Not a lot of "monotheism" in torah/sanhedrin/quran or old testament. A number of (little g) gods. It was a question of which one held authority where. This is true in every great religion.
This is totally out of context. The Talmudic examples are without the rest of the context. In most of these examples they are written from the perspective of a tragedy against the will of the other person.
For example the first 1 is about a child that was molested against their will and if it was still permissible for the child to marry later. It is not condoning sodomy of a child. Literally Sanhedrin 64 discusses how to punish the perpetrator (they decided to stone them to death or burn them) and then answer the question if the child was the daughter of a priest could she still marry another priest (They said she could).
In the second issue of giving a child over to Moloch it is discussing if a person is guilty of 2 crimes or one and they site the same verse from the Torah (first 5 books of bible the books Moses) as the christian side does. The question is if they are guilty of both idolatry and giving their child over to the fires of Moloch. It is literally a deliberation on how severely they should punish the offender.
This anti-semetic nonsense has to stop. The reality is Jesus was jewish and lived his life as a jew. Paul was a pharisee and died claiming to be a pharisee. Because there are evil people in the world who are jewish does no mean all jews are evil or that Judaism is evil. There are people that are christian or claiming to be christian and part of this evil DS group.
We can agree to disagree. Call it anti-semitism if you want, reading more into the Talmud it is just getting worse and worse at this point. You would have to explain away quite a lot to refute it is very bizarre.
There is plenty of violent fucked up shit in Sanhedrin, Old Testament, Quran. Each twist the words of the others to their own ends. Easy to do.
Your claim that "it seems pretty well written" is evidence you likely don't read much. CW was a hard core anti-semitic "Christen Identity" publisher. In the likely event you have no clue what that is, it was a early 19th century movement in England claiming white English folks were the true jews.
"and cites (sic) pretty much every claim..." Yikes my dude. Just because he uses quotation marks doesn't make it a citation. As in this case, it is used simply to fool fools who he knows wont bother to go to the source. Here is a test See if you can find 1 quote as he claims it on the left side of the list. Start with the Sanhedrin. https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.66a?lang=bi
Yeah not believing the cookie cutter website sefaria.org. Reads like I'm reading snopes... Interestingly enough I am finding many more good resources about the Talmud, of course none are found through google. Seems to be hidden information on the topic.
There are two "Talmud's" both of which have hundreds to thousands of authors opinions of every subject you can imagine and both of which have been translated and published multiple times over the centuries. Further, Talmud is often conflated with Torah. Plenty of versions and individual interpretations. If you look hard enough I suspect you will be able to find a few that can be construed to fit what ever your preconceived notion is. You can have your very own truth, google free...
No there's a pattern. You've never heard of Kapparat? Happens every year in Brooklyn thousands of Jews sacrifice chickens in the streets. Freaks out the residents they just leave the dead chickens in the street don't even clean them up. People complain cops do nothing. What kind of demented practice is that? Goes right along with the sacrificing to Molech. This is all hush hush though
I've never read the Talmud nor do I know anything about it. Add another subject to my ever-growing list.
Recently read a little about catholics and communion.
Eat the body and drink the blood of Christ?
Sound a bit like cannibals and Satanists, no?
What is the title of the book and its author?
"Who is Esau-Edom" by Charles Weisman
Thanks for the info, fren.
https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2016/10/11/longtime-christian-identity-publisher-charles-weisman-dead
^Interesting^:
"“I do research about anything where the truth and the facts aren't readily known or have been distorted," Weisman told City Pages of Minneapolis in a May 2015 interview. "My beliefs are grounded in the truths I've found out in my study, my research. Most people don't think for themselves. They listen to the government. They listen to some media."
Was he a "Christian conspiracy theorist"...or a little too close to the truth???
Being soulless, though, is an equal-opportunity career path.
He was a publisher of anything anti-jew. Cross reference any of his "citations" on your own if you wish to know who was distorting what. CW was likely (though he denied it) the author of the "Elders of Zion" fraud. He was certainly the publisher and wrote the intro. CW wasn't a "researcher" other than efforts to find anything in old text that could be distorted to support his belief that the lily white Brits were actually "Gods chosen people" and the chosen people of the old testament were actually Satanists. What he got right was "Most people don't think for themselves. They listen to the government. They listen to some media."...and that was his con. He was the media. He knew that just because it was published in a book folks would read it and most would never check sources on their own....that's a little close to the truth of it.
Sigh, that's disappointing. Good to know, though, that he was a sham along with the rest of media. It's hard to find a good man today.
Thanks, fren!
There is some subtilty to the layers of deception. Not a lot of "monotheism" in torah/sanhedrin/quran or old testament. A number of (little g) gods. It was a question of which one held authority where. This is true in every great religion.
What book is it?
"Who is Esau-Edom" by Charles Weisman
This is totally out of context. The Talmudic examples are without the rest of the context. In most of these examples they are written from the perspective of a tragedy against the will of the other person.
For example the first 1 is about a child that was molested against their will and if it was still permissible for the child to marry later. It is not condoning sodomy of a child. Literally Sanhedrin 64 discusses how to punish the perpetrator (they decided to stone them to death or burn them) and then answer the question if the child was the daughter of a priest could she still marry another priest (They said she could).
In the second issue of giving a child over to Moloch it is discussing if a person is guilty of 2 crimes or one and they site the same verse from the Torah (first 5 books of bible the books Moses) as the christian side does. The question is if they are guilty of both idolatry and giving their child over to the fires of Moloch. It is literally a deliberation on how severely they should punish the offender.
This anti-semetic nonsense has to stop. The reality is Jesus was jewish and lived his life as a jew. Paul was a pharisee and died claiming to be a pharisee. Because there are evil people in the world who are jewish does no mean all jews are evil or that Judaism is evil. There are people that are christian or claiming to be christian and part of this evil DS group.
We can agree to disagree. Call it anti-semitism if you want, reading more into the Talmud it is just getting worse and worse at this point. You would have to explain away quite a lot to refute it is very bizarre.
You do know this is one seriously crap source, yes?
Actually it seems pretty well written and cites pretty much every claim made in the book.
There is plenty of violent fucked up shit in Sanhedrin, Old Testament, Quran. Each twist the words of the others to their own ends. Easy to do. Your claim that "it seems pretty well written" is evidence you likely don't read much. CW was a hard core anti-semitic "Christen Identity" publisher. In the likely event you have no clue what that is, it was a early 19th century movement in England claiming white English folks were the true jews. "and cites (sic) pretty much every claim..." Yikes my dude. Just because he uses quotation marks doesn't make it a citation. As in this case, it is used simply to fool fools who he knows wont bother to go to the source. Here is a test See if you can find 1 quote as he claims it on the left side of the list. Start with the Sanhedrin. https://www.sefaria.org/Sanhedrin.66a?lang=bi
Yeah not believing the cookie cutter website sefaria.org. Reads like I'm reading snopes... Interestingly enough I am finding many more good resources about the Talmud, of course none are found through google. Seems to be hidden information on the topic.
There are two "Talmud's" both of which have hundreds to thousands of authors opinions of every subject you can imagine and both of which have been translated and published multiple times over the centuries. Further, Talmud is often conflated with Torah. Plenty of versions and individual interpretations. If you look hard enough I suspect you will be able to find a few that can be construed to fit what ever your preconceived notion is. You can have your very own truth, google free...
No there's a pattern. You've never heard of Kapparat? Happens every year in Brooklyn thousands of Jews sacrifice chickens in the streets. Freaks out the residents they just leave the dead chickens in the street don't even clean them up. People complain cops do nothing. What kind of demented practice is that? Goes right along with the sacrificing to Molech. This is all hush hush though
Crazy shit right there. I have heard of it. Didn't know it was a thing in Brooklyn