This is totally out of context. The Talmudic examples are without the rest of the context. In most of these examples they are written from the perspective of a tragedy against the will of the other person.
For example the first 1 is about a child that was molested against their will and if it was still permissible for the child to marry later. It is not condoning sodomy of a child. Literally Sanhedrin 64 discusses how to punish the perpetrator (they decided to stone them to death or burn them) and then answer the question if the child was the daughter of a priest could she still marry another priest (They said she could).
In the second issue of giving a child over to Moloch it is discussing if a person is guilty of 2 crimes or one and they site the same verse from the Torah (first 5 books of bible the books Moses) as the christian side does. The question is if they are guilty of both idolatry and giving their child over to the fires of Moloch. It is literally a deliberation on how severely they should punish the offender.
This anti-semetic nonsense has to stop. The reality is Jesus was jewish and lived his life as a jew. Paul was a pharisee and died claiming to be a pharisee. Because there are evil people in the world who are jewish does no mean all jews are evil or that Judaism is evil. There are people that are christian or claiming to be christian and part of this evil DS group.
We can agree to disagree. Call it anti-semitism if you want, reading more into the Talmud it is just getting worse and worse at this point. You would have to explain away quite a lot to refute it is very bizarre.
This is totally out of context. The Talmudic examples are without the rest of the context. In most of these examples they are written from the perspective of a tragedy against the will of the other person.
For example the first 1 is about a child that was molested against their will and if it was still permissible for the child to marry later. It is not condoning sodomy of a child. Literally Sanhedrin 64 discusses how to punish the perpetrator (they decided to stone them to death or burn them) and then answer the question if the child was the daughter of a priest could she still marry another priest (They said she could).
In the second issue of giving a child over to Moloch it is discussing if a person is guilty of 2 crimes or one and they site the same verse from the Torah (first 5 books of bible the books Moses) as the christian side does. The question is if they are guilty of both idolatry and giving their child over to the fires of Moloch. It is literally a deliberation on how severely they should punish the offender.
This anti-semetic nonsense has to stop. The reality is Jesus was jewish and lived his life as a jew. Paul was a pharisee and died claiming to be a pharisee. Because there are evil people in the world who are jewish does no mean all jews are evil or that Judaism is evil. There are people that are christian or claiming to be christian and part of this evil DS group.
We can agree to disagree. Call it anti-semitism if you want, reading more into the Talmud it is just getting worse and worse at this point. You would have to explain away quite a lot to refute it is very bizarre.