The premise is the same. Same reason the injection sights would be magnetic - iron in the body concentrates in areas of inflammation, likewise magnetoferritine concentrates in areas of inflammation - lighting up said area in turn when imaged.
UV Light generates "heat," which kills. Sunlight kills is a point Q emphasized twice.
Yes, I'm well aware of the "chlorine" therapies and the controversy along those lines - not focused on that. UV, rather. Electromagnets make sense too - ever built an induction forge in your garage?
Do you understand what I mean, when I say the concept he addressed in the press conference, may be related to this campaign trail promise, and may be related directly to the immense leaps in magnetic technology made during his administration? See for instance the dates of the numerous articles I've linked regarding magnetoferritine -
Trusting my source, I'm betting on it, big, now. I mean you can doubt, I will not attempt to change your mind and I'm not going to think of you any differently either way on what your evaluation of my understanding is here. What matters to me is I think I figured it out the mystery I've been interested in. That's what's big to me.
UV can't get very far into the skin. Sunlight won't reach much into the nose and throat tract. Or lungs, unless you can push a UV light fiber in there.
Suppose the vacc has such nanoparticles and UV in sunlight activates it. But the vacc is supposed to stay in the arm and not zip around in the bloodstream, which is why in Europe they adjusted the procedure to check for blood -- they didn't want to jab into a vein.
So it stays around the arm and say it gets UV. Then your UV or heat therapy would only be good near the injection area. But the worst-hit (or most susceptible, due to ACE2 receptors) organ is often the lungs.
Zapping nanoparticles to kill cancer cells is common research. But virus replicates inside normal cells. How to target them? Ferretin cannot magically seek virus-infected cells. It's not a smart nanobot. Targeting is an issue here.
Well, about the induction current thing, you should try to find people who can zap nanoparticles with a coil and get them hot. Coupling a coil and nanoparticles? Can you induce viable current loops in a single Fe ion? (Because when complexed with Ferretin, it's all separate single Fe ions complexed with the protein.)
If magnetoferritin is in the vaccine, then with certainty - due to the amount of inflammation in the tissue in the injection site, it would in turn bind to that area, at least temporarily. Ordinary iron does so - even sweat can cause partial magnetism, so surely a concentration of magnetoferritin.
The premise is the same. Same reason the injection sights would be magnetic - iron in the body concentrates in areas of inflammation, likewise magnetoferritine concentrates in areas of inflammation - lighting up said area in turn when imaged.
UV Light generates "heat," which kills. Sunlight kills is a point Q emphasized twice.
Yes, I'm well aware of the "chlorine" therapies and the controversy along those lines - not focused on that. UV, rather. Electromagnets make sense too - ever built an induction forge in your garage?
Consider the following:
https://youtu.be/QZKhlYG6yLc?t=60
Do you understand what I mean, when I say the concept he addressed in the press conference, may be related to this campaign trail promise, and may be related directly to the immense leaps in magnetic technology made during his administration? See for instance the dates of the numerous articles I've linked regarding magnetoferritine -
https://europepmc.org/backend/ptpmcrender.fcgi?accid=PMC5831262&blobtype=pdf 2017
https://www.biotechniques.com/cancer-research/magnetoferritin-a-new-effective-marker-for-tumor-diagnosis-and-treatment/ 2018
https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/20/10/2426/htm 2019
I haven't even touched on the advancements in magnetic theory patented by Salvatore Pais of USN / now USAF during and leading up to Trump's presidency either.
Trusting my source, I'm betting on it, big, now. I mean you can doubt, I will not attempt to change your mind and I'm not going to think of you any differently either way on what your evaluation of my understanding is here. What matters to me is I think I figured it out the mystery I've been interested in. That's what's big to me.
UV can't get very far into the skin. Sunlight won't reach much into the nose and throat tract. Or lungs, unless you can push a UV light fiber in there.
Suppose the vacc has such nanoparticles and UV in sunlight activates it. But the vacc is supposed to stay in the arm and not zip around in the bloodstream, which is why in Europe they adjusted the procedure to check for blood -- they didn't want to jab into a vein.
So it stays around the arm and say it gets UV. Then your UV or heat therapy would only be good near the injection area. But the worst-hit (or most susceptible, due to ACE2 receptors) organ is often the lungs.
Zapping nanoparticles to kill cancer cells is common research. But virus replicates inside normal cells. How to target them? Ferretin cannot magically seek virus-infected cells. It's not a smart nanobot. Targeting is an issue here.
Well, about the induction current thing, you should try to find people who can zap nanoparticles with a coil and get them hot. Coupling a coil and nanoparticles? Can you induce viable current loops in a single Fe ion? (Because when complexed with Ferretin, it's all separate single Fe ions complexed with the protein.)
It's late, I'll have to get back to you after I get some sleep, work, and have time again for research, but I'm not just gonna leave you hanging:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8i2OVqWo9s0
"Heat." Maybe that's the idea? I don't know - opens a door though, have to look when I can.
Morning Edit:
Apparently, Trump beat me to it.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/09/04/909348915/president-trumps-new-covid-19-advisor-is-making-public-health-experts-nervous
Back in September 2020, he selected a magnetic resonance imaging specialist as a leading Covid-19 advisor.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging deals directly with magnetoferritin as a nanoprobe to detect ‘infection’ in individuals - https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/abs/10.2217/nnm-2016-0369?journalCode=nnm - deal
If magnetoferritin is in the vaccine, then with certainty - due to the amount of inflammation in the tissue in the injection site, it would in turn bind to that area, at least temporarily. Ordinary iron does so - even sweat can cause partial magnetism, so surely a concentration of magnetoferritin.
Further to be continued -
Need more research.