I have seen many contradictory posting on this topic so I thought I would summarize my thoughts and would like feedback on others opinions.
Shouldn't it be pretty straight forward if fraud is found in Arizona to compare the major discovery to the other states and determine if those states are legitimate or not? I would think this would be a pretty straight forward to overturn the other elections once the full audit is complete and it the evidence is conclusive of the ways and outlets they cheated and by how much.
An analogy of this for example is if a thief is caught in the act robbing a bank and the way in which that thief robbed the bank is in line with a dozen other banks that were robbed. That is usually enough probable cause to charge the thief with those crimes as well, even though he wasn't caught in the act of those robberies.
So when the evidence is conclusive in Arizona that says overwhelming fraud was discovered and this is the way in which they cheated and by how much. The election should either be overturned due to fraud or it should be easy to cross check the fraud in the largest of democrat cities and find the very minimal amounts of votes needed for Trump.
I am also thinking about the comment made in Arizona over the weekend stating the Securities exchange commission and military fraud departments are involved in the audit. If the SEC is involved, my guess is they are tracing some transactions that took place and following the money. If that is the case and they can identify the source they could easily extend that source to other possible culprits involved in the other elections, thus ruling those states are all corrupt as well.
Once the AZ audit completes, won’t they have to go through the process of decertifying? Several more states will need to go through the same formal process in order for the official electoral count to show in trumps favor in order for the rest of the world to accept that Trump belongs in the whitehouse. Just because we have the evidence, doesn’t mean it will overturn for other states without other audits or processes to decertify.
If the military is the only way... I think AZ gives them the card to make their move. Right now they ran some unauthorized system, probably prototype that has never been used before. In order to act on the merits of the system they need confirmation of its legitimacy in use.
When AZ shows that the fraud their system captured was within a threshold of accuracy then they have the proof the system worked as designed and was not giving false results.
I think thats all they will need. They would not need the states to decertify anything. The states already committed treason. Therefore they have enough for military tribunals to lock up these shitbags.