The "first arrest" will not be Trump, people. Again, the most misquoted Q drop of all time reads: "First arrest will verify action and confirm future direction".. Think about what future direction Trump's arrest would confirm? Still not enough? Read on - The Great Awakening

374

The "first arrest" will not be Trump, people. Again, the most misquoted Q drop of all time reads: "First arrest will verify action and confirm future direction".. Think about what future direction Trump's arrest would confirm? Still not enough? Read on ?️ DISCUSSION ?

posted 3 years ago by XpatDemocrat 3 years ago by XpatDemocrat +375 / -1

Burn it in your head:

#3717

First indictment [unseal] will trigger mass pop awakening. First arrest will verify action and confirm future direction. They will fight but you are ready. Marker [9]. Q

https://qagg.news/?q=First+arrest+

People seem to think a Trump arrest would trigger mass pop awakening, and I would disagree for a lot of reasons, however this isnt about my opinion. Q says the first indictment will, not the first arrest.

Trump's crimimal proceedings are on a state level in New York and therefore charges are filed by a district attorney; not by indictment.

If Trump is arrested, get ready for war; enough said.

143 comments

143 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (143)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– dixieleeanon 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

Nice! I wonder must it be 1?

Like could it be 1 in several places?

If its just 1 here (which I understand q has alluded to the world is watching us) But what if with this first one it's in several places at the same time but in the same vein...

I think then it would be maybe a little bit less Trump behind it by way of a parents if for example it were at the same time Biden, Merkel, Trudeau, Macron etc.

Each individually in their own country would cause people to pay attention and if it were happening like that then people would have to stop and try to figure out what's going on

I know it's a stretch, but I wonder

permalink parent save report block reply