It's absolutely because of the censorship, I would contend.
"There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'QANON'. 3
Media labeling as 'QANON' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2."
The MSM push to call anyone who questions their narrative a "Qanon conspiracy theorist" is one of their most potent weapons, right now.
"Fear will keep the local systems in line," as it were.
They can't ban common sense. They can't ban links to info. They can't ban people asking questions. They can't ban intelligence. THEY CAN'T STOP US!!!!!
funny, ive always described myself as "Q adjacent" even though i have the opinion that the Q op, while "legit" and accomplishing some good results, is basically a minority faction of the Illuminati going on the offense against its opposition.
no, i absolutely agree with the standard Q model that Q and trump/scavino/etc are part of the same op... im saying trump and the rest are still Illuminati though, as demonstrated by their bloodline (john of gaunt etc) and their tactics (must allow their opposition to execute their plan - release the bioweapon, economically destabilize - while the Q side can formulate responses but not directly force a solution on the world)... i appreciate your reply, though, youre the first person on here to even evaluate my position statement...usually i end up getting banned as a "shill" by lying POSs like "TheQStrategy".
I wonder if this is due to censorship? I know that I get flagged on Facebook when I mention Q or any of the catch phrases.
It's absolutely because of the censorship, I would contend.
"There is 'Q'. 1 There are 'Anons'. 2 There is no 'QANON'. 3 Media labeling as 'QANON' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2."
The MSM push to call anyone who questions their narrative a "Qanon conspiracy theorist" is one of their most potent weapons, right now.
"Fear will keep the local systems in line," as it were.
Great comment!
They can't ban common sense. They can't ban links to info. They can't ban people asking questions. They can't ban intelligence. THEY CAN'T STOP US!!!!!
The writer of that article has no idea there are PLENTY of free speech platforms out there where we can say whatever the hell we want. And we DO.
funny, ive always described myself as "Q adjacent" even though i have the opinion that the Q op, while "legit" and accomplishing some good results, is basically a minority faction of the Illuminati going on the offense against its opposition.
Exposing their centuries of fuckery is a terrible way to stay in the shadows undetected, IMO.
That wouldn't explain the myriad connections between Q post #s and Scavino/45 Desk timestamps, etc.
(Or the nearly 50 zero deltas where Q would post first and DJT would tweet within 60s).
no, i absolutely agree with the standard Q model that Q and trump/scavino/etc are part of the same op... im saying trump and the rest are still Illuminati though, as demonstrated by their bloodline (john of gaunt etc) and their tactics (must allow their opposition to execute their plan - release the bioweapon, economically destabilize - while the Q side can formulate responses but not directly force a solution on the world)... i appreciate your reply, though, youre the first person on here to even evaluate my position statement...usually i end up getting banned as a "shill" by lying POSs like "TheQStrategy".
People are welcome to be skeptical. We make progress when folks ask questions.
We got where we are by the general public just accepting that what they're being told by the MSM each day is fact, when clearly it's not.
As Bongino says, "They're telling you a story, they're just not telling you THE story."
amen...
Unless, of course, one believes that DJT is in on as a bad guy, too.