8
VoxDawg 8 points ago +8 / -0

Most deltas are counted excluding the end date to reflect complete days elapsed, Anon.

4
VoxDawg 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is likely why they're trying to word it like a structure that was physically taken apart.

2
VoxDawg 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was during No Name's funeral. At the time, I recall anon speculation being that the DS Dramatis Personae took the ceremony as an opportunity to pow-wow about Spygate-related matters, but we've been told multiple meanings exist, soooooo...

3
VoxDawg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Outstanding catch. Sounds like MAL with the comments about blocking the view.

1
VoxDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Neon blew his book advance on bad crypto deals and hasn't forgiven DJT.

1
VoxDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

If Candace is so MAGA, why isn't she on Truth Social?

1
VoxDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

He also was providing cover for the RBG smokescreen, double pinky swearing that he saw her working out in DC a few weeks after Fox & Friends ran that breaker in Jan 2019 about her having died.

1
VoxDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's very interesting.

1
VoxDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sex with a HS girl would shatter that spiteful little goblin's skeleton.

1
VoxDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

What anons have jokingly referred to as 'time travel' by QTeam is likely just the reverse-engineering of decision trees, based on weighted analysis from the super/quantum computing employed by the good guys.

2
VoxDawg 2 points ago +2 / -0

I posted on TS last week:

Job #1 is to follow the facts on all possibilities. If #Devolution and #Reconstitution eventually diverge, then some decisions will have to be made. Until those divergences become irreconcilable, I think we're duty-bound to explore all possibilities.

If the core tenet of Reconstitution is that we've been in a COG formation since 9/11, then the premise of Devolution beginning on/around Dec. 7, 2020 is incongruous. Right now, everything is on the table, IMO.

1
VoxDawg 1 point ago +1 / -0

He did no such thing, and if you believe that, your reading comprehension is sorely lacking. He even expressly says this in his TS bio:

I have nothing to do with Kash Patel and he has nothing to do with me.

I've been reading Jon's stuff since Aug. 2021, when there were only a couple of parts of his Substack series were published. At NO POINT has he ever even intimated that he was Kash Patel, and he has ALWAYS been very straightforward in saying he chose his nom de plume because of his admiration for Kash.

Almost everything in the Devolution series is a real stretch.

Or you haven't taken the time to read/comprehend it. Takes us back to my first sentence.

Try beginning here if you're tripped up by PP's work itself

view more: Next ›