You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
▲
1
▼
–
inquimous
1 point
ago
+1 / -0
- It's a real virus. It has some novel aspects that the medical community is still grasping. That leads to confusion and the media fanned it because if it bleeds it leads, also they are thralls to the Chinese who would like to weaken us and the Dems who wanted to hurt Trump. Corruption in NIH and them kowtowing to Big Pharma led to more dissembling and hiding the data. I don't believe in significant asymptomatic spread. A person could be infected and shedding virus, but if they aren't showing symptoms then they don't have enough virus to be shedding much because the "shedding" is the result of the irritation which causes the symptoms.
- It's a real virus and it was meant to be more dangerous--that's what "gain of function" means, it means modifying pathogens to be more dangerous. Nice euphemism. (you could also engineer a virus for loss of function, but where's the mad scientist thrill in that) It's old news that the Chinese would like to conquer with bioweapons. In fact that is an old story in general, spread disease among the enemy. Whether it was meant to spread asymptomatically, who knows. See above. If you wanted to weaponize a disease it would be great. I don't think it was released intentionally unless the CCP thought their own herd needed culling, I think it was bad technique, and it took off because it was somewhat novel. But, even back a year, it was known that there is a large % of people who have T cell immunity to corona viruses in general, and it didn't make as many people as sick as it could have if it were truly a novel virus. The real weapon wasn't the deadliness of the virus, it was the fear. Now we have vaccines which we didn't need because there were effective treatments, but the people making vaccines couldn't make billions on a vaccine that could only have Emergency Use Authorization in the time frame IF THERE WAS A CURE. That's why they have denied the usefulness of HCQ and Ivermectin, and only allowed other experimental treatments like Remdesvir and Regeneron. We have vaccines that ought to be pulled because of side effects. Some people think there is a murderous intent behind the vaccines. I will charitably hope it's only disgusting greed and disregard for suffering that deserves some pretty harsh treatment in this life and the next.
permalink
save
report
block
reply