Breaking the law. Following orders.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (119)
sorted by:
I’m saying that believing in a room of swirling knives is the complete opposite of common sense, as is believing that an account sharing that info should be considered trustworthy.
I’m using common sense as my argument that something like that shouldn’t be used as a supporting argument that the events of the Holocaust aren’t correct
So, you answered a lot of your questions for me (incorrectly for some) Did you still want me to answer? Because I’m happy to, but I’m not if this is just a one sided discussion where you say a bunch of stuff but aren’t actually interested in my response.
Lol well I’m not JDIF then haha. I’m American. Born in Ohio in a Catholic family
Bud you asked if I agreed with a long list of things, then wrote afterwards “No? Not surprised,” not only giving my answer but even giving your own snide response to it. So yes, incorrectly.
I’m happy to have a conversation with you but you’re assuming my thoughts and basing your arguments off of your assumptions rather than wait for me to answer.
I have read the books. I’m quite familiar with some of the stuff you’ve talked about here. You’ve only assumed I’m not and wrote so within the same comment.
So, here I am, definitively stating that I am interested in having a discussion that doesn’t have to resort to assuming the stance of the other person before they can even rebut.
Are you interested in that or not? Because if so, and you only have to say yes, I will respond to your original comment and we can go from there