Incidentally a court cannot mandate this vaccine as it is only authorized under Emergency Use Authorization. The vaccine's are not even EUA for minors < 11 and only since May 10 has the Pfizer vaccine been "authorized" for minors 12 - 16.
Under 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), certain disclosures must be made prior to administering any treatment under Emergency Use Authorization. Specifically, each individual must be informed “of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.”
If anyone has kids with an ex I highly encourage them to read up. Also scholar.google.com has case law you can freely search.
Incidentally a court cannot mandate this vaccine as it is only authorized under Emergency Use Authorization. The vaccine's are not even EUA for minors < 11 and only since May 10 has the Pfizer vaccine been "authorized" for minors 12 - 16.
Under 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III), certain disclosures must be made prior to administering any treatment under Emergency Use Authorization. Specifically, each individual must be informed “of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.”
If anyone has kids with an ex I highly encourage them to read up. Also scholar.google.com has case law you can freely search.
We all need to become lawyer class citizens.