Why is it relevant if fauci did or did not read it? Genuine question.. this was sent by a random citizen and it’s just copied and pasted text from a treatment study, as other comments in this thread have pointed out.
Did not see the comments about that. If it was from a random, it then depends on filters, among other things.
Emails are simple, but they have a lot going on.
Email is reasonably assumed to have been read in general, unless it can be proven to have been put directly in junk/spam/trash by filters. There are read receipts, internal policies, all kinds of considerations.
I would assume because someone in his position would be obligated to reply to such an email, to disprove it, or something like that. I'm not really sure either
Why is it relevant if fauci did or did not read it? Genuine question.. this was sent by a random citizen and it’s just copied and pasted text from a treatment study, as other comments in this thread have pointed out.
Did not see the comments about that. If it was from a random, it then depends on filters, among other things.
Emails are simple, but they have a lot going on.
Email is reasonably assumed to have been read in general, unless it can be proven to have been put directly in junk/spam/trash by filters. There are read receipts, internal policies, all kinds of considerations.
I get that, but that doesn’t answer my question. Why does it matter if he read it or not?
I would assume because someone in his position would be obligated to reply to such an email, to disprove it, or something like that. I'm not really sure either