End result is as you said, if it ends up was a copy paste job of info on the net, it was probably glanced at, ignored, then left to sit.
It may not have any relavence at all, and he probably doesnt even remember looking at it if he's like the 99.9% of us just trying to get through the emails.
FYI:
IDK if you have to check email for work or not, I'm also making a couple assumptions as to what the actual foia request asked for as I have not read it.
Regardless, Many places get bent out of shape if you don't check email.
A few people with busy schedules have an assistant check, but not many as many emails require a direct response or contain sensitive info.
The fact that many responses are so short, it seems reasonable that he checks his own.
The email made it into the foia, so is also reasonable to assume it wasn't in junk. Also didnt get caught by server end pre-filters.
My point was more that there is no evidence that the email was from anyone credible, and wasn't just made up by some random person and sent to him. If Fauci had responded to it, then that could prove that it was legitimate. But it doesn't matter that he read it if it's just fake garbage from someone who he doesn't know.
If someone random managed to email my work email about something illegal, then me reading it doesn't mean I am involved in illegal activity.
However, I could be missing something about the context of this email leak, i.e. if there is some reason why all the emails sent to Fauci are legitimate.
End result is as you said, if it ends up was a copy paste job of info on the net, it was probably glanced at, ignored, then left to sit.
It may not have any relavence at all, and he probably doesnt even remember looking at it if he's like the 99.9% of us just trying to get through the emails.
FYI: IDK if you have to check email for work or not, I'm also making a couple assumptions as to what the actual foia request asked for as I have not read it.
Regardless, Many places get bent out of shape if you don't check email.
A few people with busy schedules have an assistant check, but not many as many emails require a direct response or contain sensitive info.
The fact that many responses are so short, it seems reasonable that he checks his own.
The email made it into the foia, so is also reasonable to assume it wasn't in junk. Also didnt get caught by server end pre-filters.
My point was more that there is no evidence that the email was from anyone credible, and wasn't just made up by some random person and sent to him. If Fauci had responded to it, then that could prove that it was legitimate. But it doesn't matter that he read it if it's just fake garbage from someone who he doesn't know.
If someone random managed to email my work email about something illegal, then me reading it doesn't mean I am involved in illegal activity.
However, I could be missing something about the context of this email leak, i.e. if there is some reason why all the emails sent to Fauci are legitimate.