It only seems that way to you because you do not understand the technology being discussed. Please see my long comment in this thread for a small attempt at explaining the technology to laypeople.
yeah i have to agree, its not really compelling, if i showed this to my family that hates me for saying things about the election they would just call me crazy... its sad what we are all going though and at this point i dont know what would work.
Because you and your family do not understand how an airplane works does not indicate that flight is impossible. Your problem here is a lack of understanding the technology. Please see my long comment here where I attempt to explain the technology in lay terms. What Mike claims to have is as certain as 2 + 2 = 4.
This man is spending tons of cash… putting his company/reputation on the line, you think he’s gonna just throw some hearsay at the surprise court. I read he’s been hiring mission impossible type spies to go all over gods creation to corroborate leads and data etc.. what kind of evidence do you want? It’s irrefutable if there legit, u want a video of Biden himself flipping votes ? People are waking up hence the name of this movement, narratives are reshaping and much faster than you think.
It is true that we are not given the packets to analyze ourselves here, but that is rather like if I claim to have a Corvette in my garage. If I do, then you could come see for yourself if I wanted to have you over. Mike might be willing to share with you the raw packet data if you want. I think he correctly assumes that most people wouldn't know what to do with it. However, the relevant technology is such that, if Mike is telling the truth that he has the packets and that legal chain of custody was maintained, then his evidence is EVERYTHING. It is rock solid, objective, and 100% irrefutable, just like he says that it is. I encourage you to read my longer comment in this thread where I attempt to explain the technical aspects in lay terms.
dont get me worng this IS EVIDENCE, just not good enough to wake people up imo, i believe and trust mike and his sources, and this lines up with everything hes said
It only seems that way to you because you do not understand the technology being discussed. Please see my long comment in this thread for a small attempt at explaining the technology to laypeople.
Dudes def a cyber professional based on his technical accuracy of explanations. So let’s change that to “anonymous Cybersecurity professional dude*”
yeah i have to agree, its not really compelling, if i showed this to my family that hates me for saying things about the election they would just call me crazy... its sad what we are all going though and at this point i dont know what would work.
Because you and your family do not understand how an airplane works does not indicate that flight is impossible. Your problem here is a lack of understanding the technology. Please see my long comment here where I attempt to explain the technology in lay terms. What Mike claims to have is as certain as 2 + 2 = 4.
i hope so man, i just didnt see anything that makes me think it isnt based on what some one said, how did he get the vote numbers?
This man is spending tons of cash… putting his company/reputation on the line, you think he’s gonna just throw some hearsay at the surprise court. I read he’s been hiring mission impossible type spies to go all over gods creation to corroborate leads and data etc.. what kind of evidence do you want? It’s irrefutable if there legit, u want a video of Biden himself flipping votes ? People are waking up hence the name of this movement, narratives are reshaping and much faster than you think.
It is true that we are not given the packets to analyze ourselves here, but that is rather like if I claim to have a Corvette in my garage. If I do, then you could come see for yourself if I wanted to have you over. Mike might be willing to share with you the raw packet data if you want. I think he correctly assumes that most people wouldn't know what to do with it. However, the relevant technology is such that, if Mike is telling the truth that he has the packets and that legal chain of custody was maintained, then his evidence is EVERYTHING. It is rock solid, objective, and 100% irrefutable, just like he says that it is. I encourage you to read my longer comment in this thread where I attempt to explain the technical aspects in lay terms.
So, what would you consider evidence?
dont get me worng this IS EVIDENCE, just not good enough to wake people up imo, i believe and trust mike and his sources, and this lines up with everything hes said