It is true that we are not given the packets to analyze ourselves here, but that is rather like if I claim to have a Corvette in my garage. If I do, then you could come see for yourself if I wanted to have you over. Mike might be willing to share with you the raw packet data if you want. I think he correctly assumes that most people wouldn't know what to do with it. However, the relevant technology is such that, if Mike is telling the truth that he has the packets and that legal chain of custody was maintained, then his evidence is EVERYTHING. It is rock solid, objective, and 100% irrefutable, just like he says that it is. I encourage you to read my longer comment in this thread where I attempt to explain the technical aspects in lay terms.
It is true that we are not given the packets to analyze ourselves here, but that is rather like if I claim to have a Corvette in my garage. If I do, then you could come see for yourself if I wanted to have you over. Mike might be willing to share with you the raw packet data if you want. I think he correctly assumes that most people wouldn't know what to do with it. However, the relevant technology is such that, if Mike is telling the truth that he has the packets and that legal chain of custody was maintained, then his evidence is EVERYTHING. It is rock solid, objective, and 100% irrefutable, just like he says that it is. I encourage you to read my longer comment in this thread where I attempt to explain the technical aspects in lay terms.