Very interesting. thank you for the very detailed explanation. If I'm following you correctly (don't have any familiarity with this subject really), we can say that if Mike Lindell has the data he claims to have, there's no way you can "spin the data" and the conclusion can be confirmed by all appropriately trained specialists?
Do you have an opinion on whether Mike really has every single "post card"? I trust him and think he's an honest, good person, but could he be mistaken? Was wondering if with your expertise you could hedge one way or another if he really has it. That really would be something.
As to "spinning the data", if Mike has legal chain of custody from the networked machines to the packets he now has which were captured, then there really isn't much room to spin. It is possible, I suppose, that one could set up a network and fake election data packets, but such a fake would likely not match the real election in many important ways. And such a fake would not have a legal chain of custody. People can lie pretty creatively, however, but I consider this to be pretty decisive. Put it this way, they should not be able to spin this any better than a forensic analysis on digital financial transactions could be spun. And, to my knowledge, when something like the IRS or SEC makes a case based on such data, they win decisively, people go to jail, and/or serious penalties are levied.
I also trust Mike Lindell and believe him to be genuine. I do not have any special access to him, however, so I guess time will tell if he's suckered me in or if he is who he claims to be. As far as whether or not he has every 'post card', I would love to know exactly how he obtained them. I have seen videos of his or on his frankspeech site (can't recall which, exactly) where he said basically that a bunch of good guys repeatedly tried to warn about such an attack and obtained no results. So they decided to record everything themselves. Who were these people? I do not know. And where did they record it? Were they at every polling station? Every county level aggregator? State level? He hasn't really said. To my understanding, there is some sort of "Edison Board" where the vote tallies were supposed to pass through and people can pay to access that system. That's allegedly how MSM outlets show voting totals as they come in. Many early grassroots analyses were based on, for example, the New York Times reports from their access to the Edison Board.
Here's what I hope and think might very well be true: Trump said, "We got them! We got them all!" Trump also called out fraud going back to at least 2012, as I recall. He even stated very specifically over the years various aspects of the fraud. Based on this, I suspect that the military was involved in the data collection. And I suspect the military leaked copies to Mike as part of ongoing irregular warfare efforts. This seems consistent with the DoD warfighting manuals (you know, all that 11.3 stuff and whatnot) and everything else we know. It may be the military is backing Mike and Mike doesn't even fully realize that's who is helping support his efforts. If this is true, perhaps Trump is indeed still controlling much of the military and acting as President (which he is, having won re-election) with many important things going on in the world.
In any case, time will tell. The only thing we know with certainty is that it is God's plan which will prevail in the end. Let's pray God wants to see the US restored to glory with a new peace and prosperity for all of its citizens as they soon embark on a new Golden Age.
Edit: It is worth noting that Mike has said he would gladly share all his data with Rachel Maddow and/or Anderson Cooper, let them thoroughly investigate it, and then report on it with one condition: they have to agree to have him on to discuss their findings. He made this offer on an appearance on Bannon's War Room. To my knowledge, neither has accepted Mikes offer. Mike seems extremely confident, and, so far, no one on the other side seems to want to address his case at all.
I don't know why he bothers with media personalities at all. Just release the raw data to the world, and then experts everywhere can start verifying the evidence. That's the real "proof", the pcap files and the digital signatures to verify their provenance. Not a video, not some expert testimony. Without independently verifying these files, we cannot claim to have proof yet.
Very interesting. thank you for the very detailed explanation. If I'm following you correctly (don't have any familiarity with this subject really), we can say that if Mike Lindell has the data he claims to have, there's no way you can "spin the data" and the conclusion can be confirmed by all appropriately trained specialists?
Do you have an opinion on whether Mike really has every single "post card"? I trust him and think he's an honest, good person, but could he be mistaken? Was wondering if with your expertise you could hedge one way or another if he really has it. That really would be something.
Thanks again for taking time to inform us.
As to "spinning the data", if Mike has legal chain of custody from the networked machines to the packets he now has which were captured, then there really isn't much room to spin. It is possible, I suppose, that one could set up a network and fake election data packets, but such a fake would likely not match the real election in many important ways. And such a fake would not have a legal chain of custody. People can lie pretty creatively, however, but I consider this to be pretty decisive. Put it this way, they should not be able to spin this any better than a forensic analysis on digital financial transactions could be spun. And, to my knowledge, when something like the IRS or SEC makes a case based on such data, they win decisively, people go to jail, and/or serious penalties are levied.
I also trust Mike Lindell and believe him to be genuine. I do not have any special access to him, however, so I guess time will tell if he's suckered me in or if he is who he claims to be. As far as whether or not he has every 'post card', I would love to know exactly how he obtained them. I have seen videos of his or on his frankspeech site (can't recall which, exactly) where he said basically that a bunch of good guys repeatedly tried to warn about such an attack and obtained no results. So they decided to record everything themselves. Who were these people? I do not know. And where did they record it? Were they at every polling station? Every county level aggregator? State level? He hasn't really said. To my understanding, there is some sort of "Edison Board" where the vote tallies were supposed to pass through and people can pay to access that system. That's allegedly how MSM outlets show voting totals as they come in. Many early grassroots analyses were based on, for example, the New York Times reports from their access to the Edison Board.
Here's what I hope and think might very well be true: Trump said, "We got them! We got them all!" Trump also called out fraud going back to at least 2012, as I recall. He even stated very specifically over the years various aspects of the fraud. Based on this, I suspect that the military was involved in the data collection. And I suspect the military leaked copies to Mike as part of ongoing irregular warfare efforts. This seems consistent with the DoD warfighting manuals (you know, all that 11.3 stuff and whatnot) and everything else we know. It may be the military is backing Mike and Mike doesn't even fully realize that's who is helping support his efforts. If this is true, perhaps Trump is indeed still controlling much of the military and acting as President (which he is, having won re-election) with many important things going on in the world.
In any case, time will tell. The only thing we know with certainty is that it is God's plan which will prevail in the end. Let's pray God wants to see the US restored to glory with a new peace and prosperity for all of its citizens as they soon embark on a new Golden Age.
Edit: It is worth noting that Mike has said he would gladly share all his data with Rachel Maddow and/or Anderson Cooper, let them thoroughly investigate it, and then report on it with one condition: they have to agree to have him on to discuss their findings. He made this offer on an appearance on Bannon's War Room. To my knowledge, neither has accepted Mikes offer. Mike seems extremely confident, and, so far, no one on the other side seems to want to address his case at all.
I don't know why he bothers with media personalities at all. Just release the raw data to the world, and then experts everywhere can start verifying the evidence. That's the real "proof", the pcap files and the digital signatures to verify their provenance. Not a video, not some expert testimony. Without independently verifying these files, we cannot claim to have proof yet.