What he said:
"Nah, it's a "critique" of "the infaliability" of science, conveniently overlooking the fact that science is a recursive examination and elimination of possibilities, not a declaration of absolutism. The fact that science changes is proof that it works."
My response: exactly right on my argument at least you got that right, the part where you are wrong is suggesting that right now the "experts" could be just as wrong as the "experts" of Galileo's years I'm not anti science I'm anti dogma and the bastardization of science, science requires an open mind
Reply to Commie_EntSniper (kek) on reddit
What he said: "Nah, it's a "critique" of "the infaliability" of science, conveniently overlooking the fact that science is a recursive examination and elimination of possibilities, not a declaration of absolutism. The fact that science changes is proof that it works."
My response: exactly right on my argument at least you got that right, the part where you are wrong is suggesting that right now the "experts" could be just as wrong as the "experts" of Galileo's years I'm not anti science I'm anti dogma and the bastardization of science, science requires an open mind
archived in case these fools change or delete their comments
https://web.archive.org/web/20210604170404/https://www.reddit.com/r/Qult_Headquarters/comments/ns5mss/these_people_are_so_dumb/