I don't get while this debate always comes up. Everyone is motivated by something: money, drugs, sex, fame, possessions, etc and NO ONE is above this. The questions is if what they're doing or how they are going about achieving those things is good or bad, even then it's still a balancing act, not black and white.

For 107 the breakdown is

Money - The guy already has lots of money, the book promotion is not a big piece of pie for him.

Fame/Ego - Uses a fake name, doesn't show his face. He could come out later and claim credit publicly but I doubt it. He's also not hiding from people either, he shows up to patriot/Q events and meets people. He does appear to have a pretty big ego and is quite the talker but again, under a fake name. That will make you famous but only in certain circles.

Drugs - These can be bought with money or provided to those with fame. He mentions booze every so often but also talks about DDing for people too.

Possessions - The guy loves his possessions, especially fast and exotic cars and likes driving them fast.

He also talks about God but cusses and talks about being a sinner himself which is more believable than if he pretended to be a devout Christian. So in summation, he stands to make some money, no direct fame, and has some very good insight despite the tangents. Seems about as legitimate as any of the internet patriots to me.

The point of these internet patriots is to have many different people talking about this plan to bring in people from all different parts of the country and different personalities. There isn't one person that knows everything because if there was the black hats would have a straw man to pin everything on. With many different people with different styles the message gets out to many different market segments and expands from there.

Different strokes for different folks but we're all ending up in the same place. WWG1WGA