Never have you seen a Q post signed off with Qannon. Only Q or on the rare occasion, Q+
The MSM fake news created the term Qanon so that when you Google/search the term, only their propaganda comes up, misinforming people and giving them only biased (crap) information.
Anyone who has ever dug into Q and used their brain LOGICALLY knows that there are Anons, and they take their marching orders from Q.
End of story.
You, your hand shake ? and your mostly deleted post history can go sit on a cactus with Pete Buttigieg
I agree that the term Qanon was often used by Anons without objection for the first few years. I've read Q since the beginning and often saw the term Qanon used on the 4chan and then 8chan boards, without anyone objecting to it.
Everyone posting there knew that Q was Q and the Anons were the Anons, but people often called Q Qanon or Q Anon or similar variations, as though Q was the top Anon - named in a way, but ultimately also anonymous. I didn't start seeing Anons objecting to the term Qanon until October 2020. That was when Q posted:
There is 'Q'. 1
There are 'Anons'. 2
There is no 'Qanon'. 3
Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]?
DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS?
Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
This makes sense and I see why it's good policy to make sure Q and the Anons are referred to separately. But someone who noticed this often wasn't the case on 8chan before October 2020 isn't necessarily a shill.
Friendly reminder -there is no Qanon. There are Anons and there is Q.
Qanon is a MSM tag put on Q to blend it in with all Anons - especially the crazies and fakes (glowies) to discredit Q.
Eat a bag of dicks, shill.
Never have you seen a Q post signed off with Qannon. Only Q or on the rare occasion, Q+
The MSM fake news created the term Qanon so that when you Google/search the term, only their propaganda comes up, misinforming people and giving them only biased (crap) information.
Anyone who has ever dug into Q and used their brain LOGICALLY knows that there are Anons, and they take their marching orders from Q.
End of story.
You, your hand shake ? and your mostly deleted post history can go sit on a cactus with Pete Buttigieg
I agree that the term Qanon was often used by Anons without objection for the first few years. I've read Q since the beginning and often saw the term Qanon used on the 4chan and then 8chan boards, without anyone objecting to it.
Everyone posting there knew that Q was Q and the Anons were the Anons, but people often called Q Qanon or Q Anon or similar variations, as though Q was the top Anon - named in a way, but ultimately also anonymous. I didn't start seeing Anons objecting to the term Qanon until October 2020. That was when Q posted:
There is 'Q'. 1 There are 'Anons'. 2 There is no 'Qanon'. 3 Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2. WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU CANNOT ATTACK THE INFORMATION [primary source 1]? DO YOU ATTACK [& TYPECAST] THROUGH USE OF OTHERS? Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].
This makes sense and I see why it's good policy to make sure Q and the Anons are referred to separately. But someone who noticed this often wasn't the case on 8chan before October 2020 isn't necessarily a shill.