It's true what you said about George Washington. Consider the fact he was tutored by the Jesuits while their order was banned. He pretended to be a Protestant and became a Freemason. Washington was also buried as a Catholic while wearing his Freemasonic apron. You're not exactly proving your point here.
I notice you didn't even touch the rest of what I posted about Loyola, the Carrolls, the Rothschilds being the Vatican bankers, the goddess Columbia equating to the Virgin Mary, etc.
As far as Weishaupt goes, prove he was a Jesuit in name only. He left the Jesuit order only because it was banned. The Freemasons were behind the French Revolution (revenge against the French monarchy for their expulsion of both the Knights Templar and the Jesuit order) and behind the capture of the Pope (which prompted the Pope to reverse the ban of the Jesuit order).
Why are all these Jesuit educated people becoming key figures in the Enlightenment anyways? It couldn't be that the Jesuits play on both sides (after all, disguising their true intentions is part of their oath) and use the Hegelain Dialectic to accomplish their goals, could it?
Now explain why the Treaty of Verona was a secret.
P.S. I'd love to see you explain why Obama had so many Georgetown graduates in his cabinet and writing his speeches, or the fact Obama's mentor was Jesuit priest and community organizer Gregory Galluzo.
The saints can't hear your prayers. They're dead and will not awake until Christ returns.
Placing a crown of roses on a statue of Mary is idolatry. I don't care if the Catholics use the term veneration to hide that.
Read your Bible and remember the words of Yashua-
Mark 7:7-9
7 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
8 For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.
9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
Compare that statement to the Roman Catholic Catechism.
Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture, then, are bound closely together, and communicate one with the other. For both of them, flowing out from the same divine well-spring, come together in some fashion to form one thing, and move towards the same goal.
As a result the Church, to whom the transmission and interpretation of Revelation is entrusted, "does not derive her certainty about all revealed truths from the holy Scriptures alone. Both Scripture and Tradition must be accepted and honoured with equal sentiments of devotion and reverence.
The coverup of pedophilia, the Vatican building that looks like a snake, Pope Benedict drooling over homosexual gymnasts without their shirts on, and the list goes on and on. Those aren't the fruits that scream the Gospel of Truth to me.
After the Freemasons were infiltrated by the Jesuits, they established the Order of DeMolay as a youth organization. Bill Clinton was a member.
Still waiting on proof.
Considering how many of your other claims were wrong, I won't hold my breath. Now you've moved on to attacking Catholic dogma? Shift those goalposts, buddy!
You've labeled Weishaupt as a crypto Jesuit, so you're basically blaming it all on the Jews. The proof is starting you in the face.
Here's Archbishop Vigano talking about the Jesuits-
And yet, now, as the October Amazon Synod draws near, and Catholic theologians increasingly find its working document a text based not on Christo-centric Christian revelation, but on observation of and respect for nature without any direct mention of Christ and his saving mission of incarnation, crucifixion, resurrection, this same Vigano is deeply troubled.
“Where is the Christian message here?” Vigano asks me, fixing me with his intense gaze under bushy eyebrows.
And he gives his own answer: “In fact, the figure of Christ is absent. The Synod working document testifies to the emergence of a post-Christian Catholic theology, now, in this moment. And this is very troubling. It is against everything I have worked for and believed for all my life.
“Let’s consider the history of the Jesuits,” Vigano continues. “That is something I am studying now with great care. In fact, if you would like to know the synthesis of my thought, it is this: What we are now seeing is the triumph of a 60-year-old plan, the successful execution of a well-thought out plan to bring a new sort of thinking into the heart of the Church, a thinking rooted in elements of Liberation Theology containing strands of Marxism, little interested in traditional Catholic liturgy or morality or theology, but rather focused on ‘praxis’ in the field of social justice. And now this plan has achieved one of its supreme goals, with a Jesuit on the See of Peter…”
DeMolay International proudly proclaims Bill Clinton's association on their website. It's pretty easy to prove that-
https://demolay.org/project/william-j-clinton/
It's true what you said about George Washington. Consider the fact he was tutored by the Jesuits while their order was banned. He pretended to be a Protestant and became a Freemason. Washington was also buried as a Catholic while wearing his Freemasonic apron. You're not exactly proving your point here.
I notice you didn't even touch the rest of what I posted about Loyola, the Carrolls, the Rothschilds being the Vatican bankers, the goddess Columbia equating to the Virgin Mary, etc.
As far as Weishaupt goes, prove he was a Jesuit in name only. He left the Jesuit order only because it was banned. The Freemasons were behind the French Revolution (revenge against the French monarchy for their expulsion of both the Knights Templar and the Jesuit order) and behind the capture of the Pope (which prompted the Pope to reverse the ban of the Jesuit order).
Why are all these Jesuit educated people becoming key figures in the Enlightenment anyways? It couldn't be that the Jesuits play on both sides (after all, disguising their true intentions is part of their oath) and use the Hegelain Dialectic to accomplish their goals, could it?
Now explain why the Treaty of Verona was a secret.
P.S. I'd love to see you explain why Obama had so many Georgetown graduates in his cabinet and writing his speeches, or the fact Obama's mentor was Jesuit priest and community organizer Gregory Galluzo.
I didn't ask you to prove that. Now you're arguing points no one ever brought up.
Pushing enlightenment philosophy pretty much sums that up.
You keep glossing over the fact that the Jesuits were infiltrated. That explains what you are seeing.
ahahahahaha
The saints can't hear your prayers. They're dead and will not awake until Christ returns.
Placing a crown of roses on a statue of Mary is idolatry. I don't care if the Catholics use the term veneration to hide that.
Read your Bible and remember the words of Yashua-
Mark 7:7-9
7 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
8 For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.
9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
Compare that statement to the Roman Catholic Catechism.
Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture, then, are bound closely together, and communicate one with the other. For both of them, flowing out from the same divine well-spring, come together in some fashion to form one thing, and move towards the same goal.
As a result the Church, to whom the transmission and interpretation of Revelation is entrusted, "does not derive her certainty about all revealed truths from the holy Scriptures alone. Both Scripture and Tradition must be accepted and honoured with equal sentiments of devotion and reverence.
https://archive.is/m6er
Yashua also said this-
Matthew 7:20
Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
The coverup of pedophilia, the Vatican building that looks like a snake, Pope Benedict drooling over homosexual gymnasts without their shirts on, and the list goes on and on. Those aren't the fruits that scream the Gospel of Truth to me.
Still waiting on proof.
Considering how many of your other claims were wrong, I won't hold my breath. Now you've moved on to attacking Catholic dogma? Shift those goalposts, buddy!
You've labeled Weishaupt as a crypto Jesuit, so you're basically blaming it all on the Jews. The proof is starting you in the face.
Here's Archbishop Vigano talking about the Jesuits-
And yet, now, as the October Amazon Synod draws near, and Catholic theologians increasingly find its working document a text based not on Christo-centric Christian revelation, but on observation of and respect for nature without any direct mention of Christ and his saving mission of incarnation, crucifixion, resurrection, this same Vigano is deeply troubled.
“Where is the Christian message here?” Vigano asks me, fixing me with his intense gaze under bushy eyebrows.
And he gives his own answer: “In fact, the figure of Christ is absent. The Synod working document testifies to the emergence of a post-Christian Catholic theology, now, in this moment. And this is very troubling. It is against everything I have worked for and believed for all my life.
“Let’s consider the history of the Jesuits,” Vigano continues. “That is something I am studying now with great care. In fact, if you would like to know the synthesis of my thought, it is this: What we are now seeing is the triumph of a 60-year-old plan, the successful execution of a well-thought out plan to bring a new sort of thinking into the heart of the Church, a thinking rooted in elements of Liberation Theology containing strands of Marxism, little interested in traditional Catholic liturgy or morality or theology, but rather focused on ‘praxis’ in the field of social justice. And now this plan has achieved one of its supreme goals, with a Jesuit on the See of Peter…”
https://insidethevatican.com/news/letter-44-2019-jonah/