Sitting around watching the puppies play allows time for reflection on various hypothetical scenarios.
Here is one:
Assume your country is engaged in a war where the enemy plans to use fear and bio-weapons (like a virus) to shut down your country for two plus years until a “vaccine” is formally approved for use on ALL citizens to be followed by a “vaccine passport.”
Would it be a brilliant tactical move to rush to the public a non-mandatory vaccine for adults on an emergency basis to prevent the collapse of the country from fear and an economic meltdown with all attendant consequences?
Which scenario would minimize casualties of the war?
Asking for a friend.
I'll ask again: if that's true, why is the cabal pushing vaccines?
They'll push vaccines regardless because their literal endgame involves vaccines in order to depopulate the earth (and implant microchips and God knows what else). They NEED vaccines to be normalized so that they can push their own in the future. It's not the bioweapons that are meant to kill us, it's the vaccines. It was part of their 16 year plan to destroy America and create the New World Order. We screwed up their plan. The Georgia guidestones talk about reducing the Earth's population to 500 million, and their plan involved WW3 (with Russia and North Korea, instigated by the DS), nukes, religious and racial wars, terrorism, massive gang violence, and 'deadly' 'extinction level' viruses (vaccines).