Fauci own NIH publication, Journal of Virology, stated that HCQ works for SARS in a paper that was published in 2005! The paper said it worked as a therapeutic and prophylactic! He should have been presented with that paper on live TV during the press conference when he said HCQ was “dangerous” for C19 and explain himself. That would have been a Perry Mason moment!
It is not "his" paper in the sense that he was an author, though. The author list is truncated in the .pdf, but if you look at the link "PMC" at the top and then "v.2;2005," you get all the authors plus more papers on virology than you want to know about.
No, but I'm seeing it attributed to him and he didn't write it, or possibly even see it among all the other papers in V. 2. At least he has plausible deniability.
Well, I didn’t attribute it to him. And given that the Journal of Virology is an NIH publication, I’m hard pressed to believe that Fasci didn’t know about this particular paper. I worked in biotech for 20 years and any publication needed to be signed off on all the upper scientific management before being published. Seeing that Fasci has been the head of the NIAID at the NIH for some 30 years, he most likely read this paper. That being said, he probably does have plausible deniability.
Fauci own NIH publication, Journal of Virology, stated that HCQ works for SARS in a paper that was published in 2005! The paper said it worked as a therapeutic and prophylactic! He should have been presented with that paper on live TV during the press conference when he said HCQ was “dangerous” for C19 and explain himself. That would have been a Perry Mason moment!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1232869/
It is not "his" paper in the sense that he was an author, though. The author list is truncated in the .pdf, but if you look at the link "PMC" at the top and then "v.2;2005," you get all the authors plus more papers on virology than you want to know about.
I never said it was “His” paper did I?
No, but I'm seeing it attributed to him and he didn't write it, or possibly even see it among all the other papers in V. 2. At least he has plausible deniability.
Well, I didn’t attribute it to him. And given that the Journal of Virology is an NIH publication, I’m hard pressed to believe that Fasci didn’t know about this particular paper. I worked in biotech for 20 years and any publication needed to be signed off on all the upper scientific management before being published. Seeing that Fasci has been the head of the NIAID at the NIH for some 30 years, he most likely read this paper. That being said, he probably does have plausible deniability.