This title of the article is misleading. It "implies" that the judge has already set this examination to go ahead and take place. The article states that there will be a hearing to decide to go forward. So, which is it? They are good to go, or they have to wait until a hearing June 21?
This title of the article is misleading. It "implies" that the judge has already set this examination to go ahead and take place. The article states that there will be a hearing to decide to go forward. So, which is it? They are good to go, or they have to wait until a hearing June 21?