They worship Satan, that should tell you everything you need to know. You’re here for a reason.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (184)
sorted by:
Because otherwise, for matter to come to be, something would have to have come from nothing, with no cause.
The only way something can come from nothing, which violates the laws of physics, is if there is some prime mover or force that is not subject to, or is outside of, the laws of physics.
God.
So what came before God? Seems like you've just added one more step in the chain of events.
There is nothing "before" God. God is the Uncaused Cause of all that has been brought into existence. He always was. He had no beginning.
So why can't that happen without God? If there doesn't need to be a cause for God why does there need to be one for anything else?
The Scientific evidence for space, time, universe coming into existence at a finite point in the past is overwhelming.
That which comes into existence needs a cause for its existence (metaphysics and the uncertainty principle does not disprove this scientific fact)
God did not come into existence, therefor God does not need a cause.
Furthermore, it is impossible to traverse an infinite. For example, If there were an infinite number of days between today and the infinite past, then we would have never arrived at today. Therefore, the universe is finite and needs a cause.
Whatever caused Space, Time, Matter an Energy to come into existence, must not, itself, be bound by any of those characteristics. I.E Timeless, Immaterial, Extremely Powerful, Etc...We’re getting awfully close to the Judeo-Christian description of God here without bringing up a single Bible verse! Lol
No, that’s the idea:
There must be some prime mover or source
God is that prime mover or source
What you’re saying is that it has no beginning
The idea of a source with no beginning is unprovable in physics
This is the idea of God
Why?
Our current understanding of physics isn't all there is to know. And even if it was, unprovable doesn't mean wrong.
Why? Because the idea that every thing that exists has a cause is as far as we have been able to go in the entirety of human thinking. Our current understanding of physics is what we know. You are implying that there is more to know, that is not known. If it can not be known, it can not be proven, so we have to infer it through its absence in our ability to observe it. So you believe in something you cannot prove to be true, and you do so in order to argue that God must not exist because we can not prove God exists. Start by getting out of your head the idea of God as an old bearded man in the sky - that is the first step. I could from here leave you with the burden of showing through logic why you must necessarily prove your assertion that we do not know enough about physics to positively state that everything has a cause and you would in turn be forced essentially to make the same argument for the existence of this unknown basis for physics as an argument for the existence of God, but I will instead change tack.
So you have to go with the most likely possibility.
If existence is caused by something outside the laws which govern physics...
What is the nature of that thing? What would you call it?