wha's cool about this is, if the insurance industry is good with insuring gun owners, then basically it says the vast majority of gun owners responsible and low risk enough that the insurers can make money. otherwise, it would be a liability that they would not be interested in doing this.
I was thinking they’re not bothering with prosecuting criminals and letting them out of jail, so this would just hurt law abiding gun owners by making them have another insurance payment every month. I’m about all insuranced out if you ask me.
wha's cool about this is, if the insurance industry is good with insuring gun owners, then basically it says the vast majority of gun owners responsible and low risk enough that the insurers can make money. otherwise, it would be a liability that they would not be interested in doing this.
Criminals should be required to have liability insurance for the damage they do to persons and property. OK? Why NOT?
I was thinking they’re not bothering with prosecuting criminals and letting them out of jail, so this would just hurt law abiding gun owners by making them have another insurance payment every month. I’m about all insuranced out if you ask me.
Oh, for the love. I didn't even read it, the headline enough was enough to make my eyes roll into the next county.
Well that is a good thing at to get people to go out of town and buy guns.
How about fuck.off.
Youngsters may not understand this clip, but they will, someday. LOL Apologies for the ewe toob.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kXZs3mjGlQU