What this is saying is that, within the lab leak theory, there are 4 distinct sub-theories, and we don't know with 100% certainty which one is the truth yet. The four sub-theories are:
It's a natural virus being studied in the lab that leaked accidentally.
It's a natural virus being studied in the lab that someone released deliberately.
It's a bioengineered virus that leaked accidentally.
It's a bioengineered virus that someone released deliberately.
This is a subtle point, so I hope I make it clearly. Laboratories that engage in highly hazardous activity are designed to PRECLUDE hazardous events. Make them impossible, in other words, by physical design and procedures, because the consequences of an "accident" can be massive and horrific. I would credit the Chinese with the know-how to do this. They are not dummies. They know what is at stake.
Therefore, there is no such thing as an "accidental leak." There can only be a deliberate release, because a deliberate release would have an element of control, which is necessary in order for the risk to be taken at all.
This being the case, it makes no difference if the virus was being studied, being customized, or being taught Hebrew. It was available. It was deadly. It was suitable to the purpose. Being engineered to purpose only increases the culpability and damnation.
Points one and two, the 'natural virus' theory. Where did it come from prior to being at the Wuhan bio-weapon lab, if indeed it is so natural? Never seen before implies it was bought into being there.. manufactured or engineered if you will.
Deliberateness of the release is the second part, which you have covered adequately.
Now, add to this whole aggregation of evidence the other things we have learned, namely that a) the chinese military was conducting bio agent testing on human lungs cultivated onto mice prior to the wuflu, and b) there are presentations at wuhan discussing how best to weaponise and profit from a pandemic.. also prior to the wuflu, then that to my mind makes this a closed issue.
All the factors that demonstrate both the weaponised virus and premeditation, planning and the will to carry out a bio-terrorist attack are present.
Report: Wuhan lab created "mice with human lungs" to test...
presents a slide titled “Global Catastrophe: Opportunities Exist.” The slide outlines what type of stocks and industries surged during the Ebola outbreak, which he uses to extrapolate financial advice on how to “make money in the next pandemic.”
What this is saying is that, within the lab leak theory, there are 4 distinct sub-theories, and we don't know with 100% certainty which one is the truth yet. The four sub-theories are:
This is a subtle point, so I hope I make it clearly. Laboratories that engage in highly hazardous activity are designed to PRECLUDE hazardous events. Make them impossible, in other words, by physical design and procedures, because the consequences of an "accident" can be massive and horrific. I would credit the Chinese with the know-how to do this. They are not dummies. They know what is at stake.
Therefore, there is no such thing as an "accidental leak." There can only be a deliberate release, because a deliberate release would have an element of control, which is necessary in order for the risk to be taken at all.
This being the case, it makes no difference if the virus was being studied, being customized, or being taught Hebrew. It was available. It was deadly. It was suitable to the purpose. Being engineered to purpose only increases the culpability and damnation.
I think you give Chinese lab safety protocols too much credit.
https://www.the-scientist.com/news-analysis/sars-escaped-beijing-lab-twice-50137
Points one and two, the 'natural virus' theory. Where did it come from prior to being at the Wuhan bio-weapon lab, if indeed it is so natural? Never seen before implies it was bought into being there.. manufactured or engineered if you will.
Deliberateness of the release is the second part, which you have covered adequately.
Now, add to this whole aggregation of evidence the other things we have learned, namely that a) the chinese military was conducting bio agent testing on human lungs cultivated onto mice prior to the wuflu, and b) there are presentations at wuhan discussing how best to weaponise and profit from a pandemic.. also prior to the wuflu, then that to my mind makes this a closed issue.
All the factors that demonstrate both the weaponised virus and premeditation, planning and the will to carry out a bio-terrorist attack are present.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9650709/Chinese-army-researchers-engineered-mice-humanized-lungs-2019-test-viruses-report-says.html
https://greatawakening.win/p/12ih9o89px/the-evidence-keeps-mounting-chin/c/
https://thenationalpulse.com/breaking/wuhan-lab-partner-scheming-on-pandemic-profits/
https://greatawakening.win/p/12j08O1mAH/conference-speech-in-2018-pandem/c/