1
DeathRayDesigner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ancient Hindu symbology. There are two kinds, clockwise (shown above) and counter-clockwise (used by Nazi Party). The kind shown is the Hindu sauwastika. If symbols are important, it is important to understand them, and be unconfused about them.

1
DeathRayDesigner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Misleading. Different average brightness levels. Fewer lights in Poland and Romania, but they have had no war damage.

1
DeathRayDesigner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Different average brightness levels. Fewer lights in Poland and Romania, as well. Significant large cities still bright in Russia.

1
DeathRayDesigner 1 point ago +1 / -0

It would be odd because it is wrong. Or they could gain a Nobel Peace Prize by proving it is not. Being totally wrong and asserting utter nonsense does not stop the chemtrails people, the Moon Hoaxers, or the Flat Earthers. Why should it stop the Holocaust Deniers?

No feelings in the way. You wouldn't even be able to hazard a name for any feelings. Just hard-headedness.

2
DeathRayDesigner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes. He led the V-2 development team. The majority of the team decided to surrender to the Americans, and got on the road to meet the Americans before they were overrun by Russians. Von Braun then worked for the Army to develop the Redstone and Jupiter ballistic missiles. He was then gathered into the Apollo program to lead the development of the Saturn launch vehicles.

2
DeathRayDesigner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not a bad idea, but I would suggest calling them "Squeaky Wheels," as it would also have a dismissive air. (It would also hint at the basis of their political influence, through the well-known saying.)

1
DeathRayDesigner 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't have to explain anything. Who says they were ever interested in the evidence? See, here's the thing: you have no ability to make the argument yourself. You have to point to videos or other transient sources. There is no earthshaking book exposing all this, is there?

The only credible way to "debunk" the existing history is to arrive at an independent and fully-referenced estimate of the correct number. That's how things are disproven---by offering an alternate and justified answer. All this arm-waving to merely deny the history is piffle. It's not a serious debunk at all. It is just contrarian propaganda.

1
DeathRayDesigner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course the Nuremberg Trials (and death camp trials) happened after the War. That is where all the evidence was presented. You are projecting. (The idea that "jewish organizations" would shower me with money is an emotional image.) There would be a lesson if you could articulate it---which you do not. Just more empty verbiage. It has nothing to do with being "ready." It has to do with being present.

I really have no patience with fantasy assertions by those who assume a lofty position while trivializing the deaths of millions of Jews in the name of truth.

6
DeathRayDesigner 6 points ago +6 / -0

But the hammer and sickle was never banned or dismissed from display in Russia. It is accepted as an historical legacy. Russian troops have sometimes displayed WWII-era flags as battle standards.

4
DeathRayDesigner 4 points ago +4 / -0

It points to the fact that the Ukrainian regime does not really have popular support. Plenty of Ukrainians who think their lives would be more peaceful and prosperous under Russian rule. Plenty who have lost loved ones from Zelensky's cannon-fodder approach to warfare. Plenty of soldiers who have no zeal to commit suicide for the sake of Zelensky's noble reputation.

1
DeathRayDesigner 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are the one who wants to disprove, so you get to do the work. I would suggest starting with the records of the Nuremberg Trials. Prove Wikipedia wrong; they have comprehensive articles and source citations. (I am wary of Wikipedia, but they are often on firm ground.)}

It's funny. You claim to be in possession of the truth, and you don't have a written corpus to prove it? Just anti-Semitic screeds and videos? Even the Nazis seemed to think they killed 6 million Jews.

1
DeathRayDesigner 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you will recall, the original post began by citing "Hogan's Heroes" as a contradiction to the horror of the Holocaust. Which is completely ignorant. Until that gaffe was mentioned as the opening argument, I didn't care about "Hogan's Heroes" either.

No tough luck when I am not joining the herd going over the cliff of nuttiness. There are no laws in America against free speech, so far as I know. I would oppose them if there were. Similarly, I do not seek to shut up other idiots that promote chemtrails, a Flat Earth, or a Moon Hoax. Therefore, I am not in league with "the same groups." If that is the best you can offer, you really ought to consider not engaging in this kind of stupid repartee.

1
DeathRayDesigner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you talking about POW camps? The issue was genocide of Jews. Most of the death camps were in Poland, which were in the Soviet zone of control. U.S. forces certainly liberated a few, and the troops saw for themselves. In fact, the commanding officer compelled the Germans from the neighboring village to come and see what had been taking place.

Explain why Adolf Eichman was willing to state a 6 million figure to a subordinate. And why there is an accounting of how many died at which facility or mode of execution (some are estimated). You are just repeating some crank fantasy. Prove it can't be done. It was an industrial process, and not all the killed were in death camps. We will likely never have a proper accounting for all the Jews killed on Russian land.

1
DeathRayDesigner 1 point ago +1 / -0

It produces hydrogen cyanide upon reaction with water, which is equally lethal against human beings. It was used to kill 1.1 million Jews in the death camps. One of its creators, Bruno Tesch, was executed in 1946 for knowingly selling the compound to the SS for use on humans.

And do you have any reason to think the Jewish scholars are wrong?

1
DeathRayDesigner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Contrails...appear when the air is moist. Necessity of physics.

1
DeathRayDesigner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only a mystery for people who don't know anything about thermodynamics or information theory.

Here's the simple disproof: random phenomena. It turns out that random phenomena can be modeled mathematically as to their implications, such as the kinetic theory of gases, which is very exact. The point is: a computation cannot produce a random series. We have been able to produce only pseudo-random series. If we were in a simulation, we would observe deviations from the results predicted by the assumption of a random process---but we do not see any. (This is basically the same disproof used against the argument that there are Hidden Variables that determine "random" phenomena.)

For those who think some imaginary masterminds could produce a computed random series, they have some problems. How do you start the computation? Do you get the same result from identical starting conditions? You have to, if it is an algorithm. Which means that the series embeds the information contained in the algorithm. But a random series has no information, so there will be a difference in entropy between a random series and an algorithmic series. Where is the missing entropy?

Learn more. Fantasize less.

0
DeathRayDesigner 0 points ago +1 / -1

Since it is a FACT that vets saw the corpses (and they were photographed), I wonder why you deny it. This whole attempt to exculpate the Nazis is an anti-factual supposition right up there with Flat Earth and Moon Hoax. I worked for 50 years with science as my warden. I know a fact from a fiction. You guys don't even know "Hogan's Heroes."

0
DeathRayDesigner 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes, you need a lecture because you are ignorant. Like that nonsense about "Hogan's Heroes." Or that nobody was aware of the Holocaust before 1970. You don't lead with howlers and expect to be taken seriously.

The only "dots" you are "connecting" are imaginary. Which is why people like you are called "dotty."

1
DeathRayDesigner 1 point ago +1 / -0

That explains the discovery of the receipts for purchase of the large quantities of Zyklon B, right? How about the library of skills set aside by the SS? It was a mixed bag. It would have been rational clean-up to eliminate evidence, but not everything was eliminated.

view more: Next ›