you need to sow doubt and say we need to learn something

I don't understand why learning something equates to doubting something. If you believe that suggesting there is something more to learn from the drop is the same as an irrational disbelief in it being a prediction, I suppose there's no hope for constructive discourse.

but to say we need more from it is foolish

I never said or implied this. I said it was more probable that there is more to it (which is backed by the evidence of past proofs), and our time would be better spent looking into things that would be beneficial to our understanding of the events, rather than determining if it was a prediction of yesterday's events, which is substantially less important, especially for those that already know Q drops aren't fancy. Otherwise, we would be like the foolish "theologians" and historians who spend so much time trying to figure out the historical (material) circumstances of Biblical accounts, past or future, that they are completely blind to the messages contained therein.

Hope or optimism should never be a substitute for seeking truth. If you believe the only purpose of Q drops is to provide blind hope, I would argue you have a lot more research to do.