Biden 2.5 hours late 3 year delta. Coincidence?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
Real stretch there. we can’t get tied up with maybe two/three year deltas plus a day or two.
Some stretching is always required to draw connections to Q drops, by design; doesn't make it untrue.
I'm not sure that this was a prediction, but no can say it wasn't. It doesn't hurt to investigate as long as there is something to be learned from it, though I'm not sure that would be the case here. Let's say it was a prediction. Now what? What can we do with that information?
Perhaps the energy would be better spent on understanding what is implied by a 2.5 hour timeframe.
I don't think you read my comment if you think I'm trying to divide anyone, or believed your hostile and defensive attitude was a necessary reaction.
There is plenty of proof. Anyone who hasn't seen enough proof that there is validity in Q drops will likely never see it. This may be a prediction, I never said it wasn't. I simply asked, "what do we do with the information if that's the case?" and suggested that looking into the potential meaning (cause) behind a 2.5 hour delay would likely be time better spent, because there's a much higher chance it was called out to draw our attention to it, rather than to be an empty proof.
I have learned plenty. There have been suggestions about who to watch with scrutiny to see their roles in things kept from the public eye, as well as those they unwittingly implicate with their facial reactions.
It seems odd that someone who demands everyone accept the infallibility of all Q interpretations imply in question that we aren't meant to learn anything from the proofs.
Does "Future proves past" ring a bell?
This proof is A LITERALLY telling us that the future proves the past
Exactly, this is not delta 3yr+1, this is delta 3yr two days in a row referencing each other. Truly spectacular find OP!