Then goes on to say in the article 'The "statistically significant" increased number of sperm was likely down to "normal individual variation" and probably not the vaccine itself, the researchers concluded. '
So complete garbage article, but hey, trust the science!
Then goes on to say in the article 'The "statistically significant" increased number of sperm was likely down to "normal individual variation" and probably not the vaccine itself, the researchers concluded. ' So complete garbage article, but hey, trust the science!
Is there any reason left at all to rely on info in an article published by the JAMA when making a personal health decision? Once a liar...
Well.one more reason for me not to get it. I am not a kid person.i do not want kids. I dont need better sperms.
Dont get me wrong.kids are great.as long as theyre not mine and i can return them