if its an open audit... then what are they finding? if they found nothing so far, they should say so, if they found somehting, they should say so.... this shit isnt open
Why would you release evidence along the way before you're done and just give the DS time to try and spin it and countermove? Are you a shill or just damn stupid?
Because if they found any solid fradulent ballots then more then just a few people know bout it. its harder to cover up the more people know, AND ITS SUPPOSE TO BE OPEN AUDIT so we should know if they found any FRAUDLENT BALLOTS
if its an open audit... then what are they finding? if they found nothing so far, they should say so, if they found somehting, they should say so.... this shit isnt open
Why would you release evidence along the way before you're done and just give the DS time to try and spin it and countermove? Are you a shill or just damn stupid?
Good answer I am sick of these impatient idiots who can't think beyond their noses
Because if they found any solid fradulent ballots then more then just a few people know bout it. its harder to cover up the more people know, AND ITS SUPPOSE TO BE OPEN AUDIT so we should know if they found any FRAUDLENT BALLOTS