I am not sure what the gold standard means in reality but it sounds like it's an old relic system that needs to adjust to the modern-day economy. A gold standard would force the United States to reduce its military and defense spending and could prevent unnecessary wars.
According to Ron Paul, MD, former US Representative (R-TX) “fiat money enable[s] government to maintain an easy war policy… To be truly opposed to preemptive and unnecessary wars one must advocate sound money to prevent the promoters of war from financing their imperialism.”
Returning to a gold standard could harm national security by restricting the country’s ability to finance national defense.
Ron Paul also said that he would never shrink National Defense but would shrink Foreign War defense to nothing. Bring them all home is what he ran on.
Franklin Delanor Roosevelt ended the gold standard in 1933 and the US government confiscated gold because They couldn't operate in that 'old relic system,' so They had it destroyed by the Great Depression. Then they sent all the conservatives to fight and die in World War II- due to their selective drafting system.
I too am ignorant of all the implications of going back to the gold standard. My gut tells me whatever they say and want, the opposite is probably true. You don't hear many people advocating for the gold standard, and I suspect many who disregard it are simply regurgitating the common talking points. With that being said, I've heard inflation being called legalized theft. On the gold standard, I believe the bankers/FED wouldn't be able to steal, with inflation, what we've worked for like they can now.
If there's one thing everyone can agree on, it's that you can't trust bankers or lawyers/politicians.
who really really really likes gold?
kek!
How did I overlook this before?! Kek
Time travel is fun
So the gold standard is best and preferable to other standards?
Interesting what they subconsciously admit.
Sgt report had an interesting video on the gold and silver standard.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/YocM7rwkzIi5/ via bitslide
https://vmcdn.ca/old/timminstoday/userfiles/images/Mining/I-love-gold-meme-Goldmember-rJjH.jpeg
That pepe reminds me of the grinch, not very cute. As for the gold standard, I am ready.
I am not sure what the gold standard means in reality but it sounds like it's an old relic system that needs to adjust to the modern-day economy. A gold standard would force the United States to reduce its military and defense spending and could prevent unnecessary wars. According to Ron Paul, MD, former US Representative (R-TX) “fiat money enable[s] government to maintain an easy war policy… To be truly opposed to preemptive and unnecessary wars one must advocate sound money to prevent the promoters of war from financing their imperialism.” Returning to a gold standard could harm national security by restricting the country’s ability to finance national defense.
Ron Paul also said that he would never shrink National Defense but would shrink Foreign War defense to nothing. Bring them all home is what he ran on.
Franklin Delanor Roosevelt ended the gold standard in 1933 and the US government confiscated gold because They couldn't operate in that 'old relic system,' so They had it destroyed by the Great Depression. Then they sent all the conservatives to fight and die in World War II- due to their selective drafting system.
I too am ignorant of all the implications of going back to the gold standard. My gut tells me whatever they say and want, the opposite is probably true. You don't hear many people advocating for the gold standard, and I suspect many who disregard it are simply regurgitating the common talking points. With that being said, I've heard inflation being called legalized theft. On the gold standard, I believe the bankers/FED wouldn't be able to steal, with inflation, what we've worked for like they can now.
If there's one thing everyone can agree on, it's that you can't trust bankers or lawyers/politicians.
Saved for the Pepe.