What is her reasoning behind pointing put that the civil rights act requires all records to be kept for 22 months? What would the point of keeping those records be, if not to review them at a later date if needed? And it only makes sense to have a third party do a review, ostensibly they would be the only possible objective party, no? Nevada, I think you have an idiot on your hands.
What is her reasoning behind pointing put that the civil rights act requires all records to be kept for 22 months? What would the point of keeping those records be, if not to review them at a later date if needed? And it only makes sense to have a third party do a review, ostensibly they would be the only possible objective party, no? Nevada, I think you have an idiot on your hands.