It's the Sheriff. County Sheriff is an elected position. This Sheriff needs to feel the heat for making this unconstitutional decision. They don't answer the the school board, but to the voters who put them there. Making this arrest when even acknowledging there is not justification for it is bowing to the school board over the people. This is just the beginning of us taking back control. Everything has been turned on it's head and it's going to take a lot to get it righted. Part of this is getting Sheriffs to do their damn job, follow the constitution!
If this is the situation I think you're referring to, that entire PD is probably about to be on the losing side of a lawsuit.
Basically, the guy asserted his 1st Amendment right to be there and the ?chief? agreed with him but continued to arrest him.
That's literally the guy saying "You have no right to arrest me" and the officer replying "I have no right to arrest you" while arresting him.
That said I don't think that's "unfortunate"
We need a good lawsuit like this to discourage this kind of absurd overreach in the future.
It's the Sheriff. County Sheriff is an elected position. This Sheriff needs to feel the heat for making this unconstitutional decision. They don't answer the the school board, but to the voters who put them there. Making this arrest when even acknowledging there is not justification for it is bowing to the school board over the people. This is just the beginning of us taking back control. Everything has been turned on it's head and it's going to take a lot to get it righted. Part of this is getting Sheriffs to do their damn job, follow the constitution!