Has anyone seen this massive QProof series. Thoughts? MAJESTIC EYES QNLY.
(youtu.be)
? JUSTIFIED REPOST OFTHE DAY ?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (68)
sorted by:
I wonder if someone from the WH's didn't drop a direct hint to an autist about 11.3, 11.4 not being dates. No one was getting that right. Not sure who landed on the Law of War manual first but this guy was the first video I saw of it.
He acknowledges another anon who had a thought but couldn't go much further than that thought. Majic Eyes Qnly is the real deal, humble and brilliant beyond genius..
OK, good to hear it was known before.
I didn't start looking into Q drops until a week or so after the election. Then it seemed a lot of people were taking hopium around all kinds of dates and then getting gut punched. As is pointed out here often, and I'm guilty of it myself, not enough of us do our own research and instead latch on to what sounds "right" and some wander off for a bit.
he has stated an autist made the comment on 4chan and he researched it after seeing it.
I am no autist and I did....perhaps these people didn't read on the couple of days these sections of the act were a big deal.
Has it ever been confirmed that it was manual codes? I mean, it suited us all to think that it was a date until it, wasn't then the frogs jumped from one lilly to another. Not being mean, but much of the time I feel like we change the narrative to suit us as much as the fake news media. Not being a doomer, it's so so many Pompeo tweets are conveniently linked to certain Q posts or Scavino tweets linking to this time stamp and that delta and it's great work really. But is it clutching at straws or is highly probable the people making the posts are on the money?